100
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] largerfather@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

why not 29 minutes? that too would save water, energy and time compared to a 30-minute shower. how did they land on 4? i think “19 minutes” would have looked nice too.

[-] largerfather@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

btw 4 minutes is totally reasonable

[-] alexandra_kollontai@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

spoken like a he/him

[-] GreatWhiteNope@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

How much hair do you have and what texture?

This is definitely not doable for me. I’m closer to 10 min for a normal shower, could probably do it in 6 if I tried to be speedy.

[-] Saeculum@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

I demand 20 minute showers. There can be no compromise in this fight for dignity.

[-] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

reasonable yes, comfy? no

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
100 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13443 readers
779 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS