Two masked men could be seen behind the tinted windows of the SUV. The vehicle, parked on a small residential street in Minneapolis-Saint Paul on Friday, January 16, belonged to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal immigration police known by its acronym ICE. Then the commotion began: despite the bitter cold and heavy, falling snow, neighbors came out of their homes, pointed the vehicle out to passersby, and shouted at the officers inside: "Get the hell out of here, you bunch of Nazis." A woman parked her car across the street to block their exit for several minutes. "They're targeting a family that lives in the neighborhood," another neighbor said.
Word spread through the many messaging groups dedicated to monitoring the activities of ICE that have sprung up across Minnesota in recent days. More residents arrived, armed with whistles. Inside one of the vehicles, an agent took photos of those present. Another made an obscene gesture with his canister of tear gas. The standoff lasted two hours. The agents eventually left.
Such has been everyday life in Minneapolis and neighboring Saint Paul since December 2025, when the Twin Cities began living under Operation Metro Surge, the deployment of 2,000 federal immigration officers. Since the death of Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother shot dead at the wheel of her car by ICE officer Jonathan Ross on January 7, something new has been taking shape in the frozen air of Minnesota. Residents have been organizing, protesting, tracking the officers and resisting with whistles. Reporters from media across the country are there, driving around the streets, on the lookout for ongoing operations.
The video of Good's death, which more than 80% of Americans have seen, proved to be a turning point. The public has not been convinced by the administration's attempt to portray the mother as a "domestic terrorist" who allegedly tried to run over the officer with her car: 53% of people surveyed by YouGov believed the shooting was not justified, compared to 28% who approved of it.
Nearly 1 out of every 3 people in the USA is a fucking psychopath.
Those are very similar to the percentage of voters in the last few elections who said they would vote for Trump no matter what. 20 to 30 percent of America is beyond salvation.
60 years of propaganda masquerading under the banner of legitimate News organizations will do that to a population.
Being told that they can have their base desires without deep consideration, that the people from which they would take what they wanted aren't really people, or are beneath consideration for various reasons, is a hell of a drug. It's the kind of state in which pretty people get to live, offered to the ugly masses. Combine that with overlords who keep those masses in a state of struggling to survive, and you have an army ready to do as you command. It's fucking insidiuous.
Easier done in a faux democracy that only leaves voters two alternatives. That's why throwing dirt works so well in American politics- you don't have to have a solid political foundation if all it takes is to convince people that the other side are demons.
Thank Republicans for that. There is no more fairness in the news
Republicans crying about news not being fair and balanced for right wing talking points is like christian fundamentalists crying that teaching the theory of evolution has an unfair edge over intelligent design.
There’s the 27% crazy factor:
the american wolfman constant is very high
What's ironic is these are the same people always yelling we don't need gun control we need more mental health help for people, and yet these are the people who need mental health help and their guns taken from them because they're a danger to themselves and others the most.
And the GOP cuts funding for mental health services at every opportunity
It’s much closer to 1/4 than 1/3. It still sucks, but those aren’t good odds in a fight.
If you look at eligible voters, it’s about 1/3 for Trump, 1/3 for Harris, and 1/3 not showing up… but with single digit percents moving those thirds up and down a hair to give Trump an edge.
I’m talking about the 28% in the poll in the actual article.
I agree it’s a depressingly high number, but 28% support for this bullshit specifically, it’s surprisingly good for this shithole country.
About 30% of adult Americans voted for trump in 2024.
...and I'm sure that same 30% would vote for him in 2028 given the chance. They literally have chosen him as their infallible God-Emperor even though he's the most fallible motherfucker alive.
It’s the Obama/Alan Keys rule: no matter how awful the opponent, 28% will vote for them.
Yes. I have a family member where I've shown them 4-5 angles and a frame by frame breakdown. They stopped saying she tried to run over the man, but they keep saying she deserved it and was asking for it.
I genuinely hate them for it. I'm so goddamn ashamed of people like this.
I am so sorry that you have family like this. I may be annoyed with my family a lot, but they're at least reasonable people who see the sickness that is happening and are just as disgusted with it as we are. I literally cannot even imagine struggling with family who thought this was deserved somehow.
That's not the right way to interpret these polls. Many people aren't answering the question literally. They're interpreting it to mean "Do you still approve of Trump's deportation policy, despite everything?" and they're saying yes to that. (It's a reasonable interpretation.) People who really are happy about the killing do exist and they're disproportionately loud online but they're not 28% of the population.
Did he fucking stutter?
The central tenet of the policy is the mass deportation of brown people without due process. I don't like throwing the word "psychopath" around for various reasons but any supporter of this policy is a massive piece of shit, including the murders or not.
Psychopaths or Sociopaths inherently "dehumanise" everyone. It's why they feel no compunction in setting up a mother of 2 to lose their job, to boost their quarterly profits.
There are other ways to dehumanise people however. The American media machine has done an excellent job of it.
It's partly why the recent killing has triggered such a reaction. It's outside the dehumanising bubble. That then had a ripple effect, akin to a rubber band snapping. It broke the trance a lot of people (of all political leanings) were caught in. It's now a case of seeing how the ripple spreads.
And/or dumb enough to not understand "due process" and therefore not value it. You know, that thing that has been central to our form of government for the last 250 years.
Lucifer (@LucifersTweetz):
1/14/2026 1:03 PM
Society and technology were advanced primarily by greed stemming from evolutionary drives gone haywire. Intellectualism and progressivism are anomalies that have struggled to survive in a world still dominated by senseless, brutal hegemony. We need to fight to keep our flame from going out, to preserve ourselves and our ideals until the rest of humanity catches up to, well, humanity.
It's rather systems of oppression promoting those behaviors, humans are fundamentally cooperative by nature.
Cooperation isn't a good thing in and of itself. People can have all sorts of reasons for cooperating, such as in the case of kapos in Nazi Germany. I wish human beings were mutually beneficial in nature because I was raised on Star Trek and dreamed of mankind advancing toward a utopian society. However, reality tells a different story. We have a long way to go yet.
Capitalism caused evolutionary drives to go haywire.
I'm pretty sure the problem started long before capitalism. As soon as we developed agriculture to feed more people with less effort - which is to say, as soon as survival stopped becoming a moment-to-moment problem in constant need of solving - we outpaced evolution.
You mean as soon as wealth accumulation became a governing societal paradigm.
I get what you're saying and I agree that the basic concept can be generalized thus, but capitalism by name wasn't invented until the 16th century AD.
Obviously there were occasional problems before capitalism. That doesn't negate what I said.
https://mindpsychiatrist.com/sociopath-vs-psychopath-born-or-made/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-biology-of-human-nature/202309/how-capitalism-is-making-us-sick
https://youtu.be/VhI5tEGc7to
For sure some of what this woman is saying is problematic, but the point stands.
Occasional problems? The entirety of human history up to the 16th century, just had occasional problems? Come on, now. All the popsci essays in the world aren't going to make me buy that take.
That's your prerogative. It isn't popsci, it's well-documented, so I will work with those who acknowledge the issues and are willing to fix them.
For everyone else, here's an article I just read:
https://archive.ph/JVPib