this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
682 points (99.9% liked)

News

34227 readers
3859 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean I feel like it's still an inarguable point as to WHY she was shot, but let's ignore even that part but why oh why did they deny her care after that? Can conservative sociopaths explain that part away, because they'll always argue about how she deserved it but did she deserve medical care?

Because at least actual cops still call an ambulance for you or let a Dr reach you

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There are times cops have shot someone 30 or more times, who is clearly absolutely dead and they will still apply bandages and give CPR sometimes to give at least the impression of protecting life. To me the denial of medical care in this situation is even more proof of guilt than the shooting because they can argue they feared for their life in the moment, but they had ample time to provide aid and deliberately blocked it.

The murderer even went to check the body immediately after but then left, I would be unsurprised if he saw she was still potentially alive and they decided to block aid intentionally to make sure she was dead. I assumed she was shot in the face or head 3 or 4 times which would be unlikely to survive, but apparently she was wounded twice in the chest on the right side, once in the forearm and once in the head. I don't know the specific damage from the shot to the head, it's most likely she would have at least been in a vegetative state or have severe brain damage if she had lived, but to deny the chance of any aid for over ten minutes would seal the deal of a conviction for murder if I were a jury member in this case.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Comment above says 2 chest, one arm

[–] beanie@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

If it turns out the shot to the face was bullet two or three, Ross is done.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not even a stretch of the imagination to come to the idea that they'd say, "she disobeyed, therefore she deserved to die".

They eagerly dehumanize anybody who diverges from their strict ideals. Remember how Kristi Noem admitted to shooting her dog dead because it behaved like the big untrained puppy that it was? She told that story because they believe that is a reasonable response to an untrained, young and full of energy dog being disobedient.

In their mind, Renee Good was no better and deserved no better than that dog.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Plus, she was a mouthy lesbian with a wife mouthing off, too. And she was supposedly an ACTIVIST. How dare she!

The ICE "officer" naturally had no other choice but to summarily execute her on the street as judge, jury and executioner.