this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
94 points (99.0% liked)
PC Gaming
13185 readers
501 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Even then, I would think it would be in the low hundreds.
300 people working on hardware, 300 people working on software, 300 people working on various smaller aspects like basic research, marketing, quality testing, etc., and 100 people in associated staff like managers, hr, janitorial, administrators, etc.
Seems reasonable to me.
I don’t think that’s reasonable. 300 people full time to release 4 headsets in the last ten years? 300 people to build a custom Android version and a shitty VR chat clone?
You may not think it's reasonable, but the evidence suggests that it is. If 100 people could do it then the market would be flooded with high quality standalone vr headset systems.
Valve did it with like 350 people in the whole company.
Valve's system isn't standalone, and wasn't trying to create a whole new vr platform like fb was trying to do
Yes, it is, and yes, they did. It can run PC games standalone, and Steam VR on SteamOS is a platform they created.
(I’m talking about the Steam Frame, not the Valve Index.)