this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
98 points (100.0% liked)

news

24529 readers
662 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a protest in San Diego against ICE.


On January 7th, 37-year-old Renee Good was murdered by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. While a considerable amount of the discussion online has been about the direction her wheels were turning and things like that, truthfully, I think it's just fundamentally bad to shoot a person to death with a gun if you happen to be a state mercenary enforcing an incredibly racist federal policy, regardless of the circumstances.

The murder has since prompted a wave of vigils and protests, not only in Minneapolis, but also in virtually every major city in the country. The demands are justice for Good in particular, and the abolition of ICE in general, to avenge its many victims. The Trump administration has done all they can to inflame the situation, designating Good a "domestic terrorist" and saying that the agent who shot her will be immune from prosecution.

Protests and resistance to this administration's policies have, encouragingly, had an element of international solidarity - not only are flags from countries throughout Latin America (and also Palestine) present, but speakers in protests have even been actively condemning the recent imperialist actions against Venezuela. For it is, of course, one joint struggle. The imperial boomerang always returns - and in the modern day, it returns rapidly.


Last week's thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 36 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah Iran vibes are very bad right now

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 34 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I strongly doubt the protests will go very far.

For one, the nature of the protests have been spontaneous and sporadic in nature and did not coalesce into rallying behind a credible leader or movement with explicit demands (the Shah family is simply too out of touch for most Iranians to be considered a legitimate leader). Protests of such nature cannot succeed in toppling the government.

However, this does not change the fact that the economic situation in Iran is extremely dire right now. This is not the slow burn from the sanctions for many years - the Iranian economy has been rapidly deteriorating since the 12-day war last June and is heading towards a falling off the cliff situation. If the ruling government cannot do anything to ease the spiraling inflation and the cost of living, then the domestic dissent can only grow.

Most importantly, the US cannot afford to have Iran collapsing into a situation that spirals beyond its control. It has already achieved its goals of pushing Russia and China out of the region. If you go to the nationalist propaganda channels on Russian telegram and Chinese social media, both are placing much blame on the Iranian government (as well as Venezuela’s) while only voicing the minimum boilerplate support on the grounds of US hypocrisy and imperialism. That’s why we can be fairly confident in saying that both Russia and China will not interfere in the Iranian crisis (and Venezuela) this time.

Recall what happened when the US hastily withdrew from Afghanistan back in 2021. The videos that emerged from it became a “last chopper out of Kabul” joke, happening at a pace so rapid that the US was conveniently throwing away a lot of their equipments behind to be freely looted by the Taliban. Many predicted that the Taliban government would let in Chinese and Russian investments, but that did not materialize at all and the cooperation that transpired has been minimal at best.

It’s been 4.5 years and what we’re seeing is the Taliban government very conveniently staying out of its way from causing trouble to the empire’s actions in the region. This could represent a new form of US exerting its imperial control - instead of explicit regime change, it simply has to drive out economic investments from foreign adversaries and the economic pressure will soon lead those extant regimes to come to a compromise with the US.

We may be seeing the same thing happening in Venezuela and Iran. The US simply has to wait. It’s not as if the liberal Iranian government is not open to a negotiation with the US (the IRGC will not, but the economic sanction is already biting on their ruling legitimacy). Raisi would have been more firm against the US, but Pezeshkian seems quite open to a compromise with the US. And that is likely the final outcome we will see with Iran.

[–] oliveoil@hexbear.net 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Could you show examples of Russia and China blaming Iran.

I don't doubt you. I'm not a Twitter user, and so I haven't been able to find what you are talking about.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I also don’t use Twitter lol, only Russian telegram and various forms of Chinese social media.

Here’s Andrey Medvedev’s telegram post about it (Russia’s premier journalist/propagandist at VGTRK):

spoiler

The argument that "we lost Iran" is unfounded for one main reason. To lose something, you first have to gain it. To obtain it.

So, in this sense, Iran wasn't a Russian ally (in the sense that older people often understand it as "eternal ally forever and ever"). It was a tactical partner, and a rather difficult one at that. And it will likely remain so, even if the government changes.

In Iran, history is well remembered (we've somewhat forgotten the history of the Caucasian campaigns). Who did Kotlyarevsky, Karyakin, Yermolov, Madatov-Karabakhsky, and Paskevich fight against? With whom did Griboyedov sign a peace treaty? Well, with Persia. In Tehran, they clearly remember that it was the Russians who took the South Caucasus from them and cut off their claims to Baku. And that the Qajar dynasty was significantly dependent on the will of the Russian Tsar is also not forgotten.

Sometimes people are surprised to learn that Iranians are actively buying real estate in Yerevan. They simply consider Yerevan historically the property of Persia. In general, relations between Iran and Russia/the USSR were very complicated in the 19th and 20th centuries. I won't go into detail about Stalin's plans to take over northern Iran after the war. But Iranians remember this, and how the Soviet Army occupied Iran alongside the British until 1945.

When the Ayatollahs came to power in Iran in 1979, the USSR naturally became Iran's adversary. Not least because Khomeini declared that "America is worse than England, England is worse than the Soviet Union, and the Soviets are worse than both." The USSR maintained a group on the Iranian border, Iran financed, trained, and armed the Afghan mujahideen (even before the US), and at the same time, the Ayatollahs slaughtered all the communists in the country. During the Iran-Iraq War, the USSR supported Saddam Hussein, signing a $13 billion arms contract. Before Desert Storm, the USSR maintained over 7,000 troops and specialists in Iraq.

The Soviet navy escorted commercial transports, and they were paid for it. Overall, Iraq won the war with Iran largely thanks to Soviet support. However, aid to Iraq weakened Iran's support for the Afghan mujahideen.

Iran and Russia began to literally rebuild their relations in the mid-1990s, but China remained Iraq's primary partner, and consequently, Pakistan, China's only ally. After 2014, the partnership became more focused, built around sanctions, the military industry, and the Syrian issue. The history of the Syrian war is a separate, larger topic. But Iran, in short, was trying to realize its goal of a Shiite belt in Syria, so Hezbollah was actively involved as a proxy. In fact, combat experience created a situation where Hezbollah controlled Lebanon. Russia was trying to eliminate the terrorists who posed a threat to us.

At the time of the Assad regime's collapse, the IRGC group, Iranian proxies, and Afghan mercenaries numbered over 15,000. They abandoned many of their bases without warning the Russian military. That is, a tactical ally, a fellow traveler, isn't exactly a perpetual brotherhood in arms.

We helped sell the Iranians their sanctioned oil, they helped us with parallel imports, we helped them with technology, and they helped us with Geraniums. However, the current Geranium only resembles the Iranian model in form. A normal "you give and I give you" relationship, without the promise of eternal friendship. And with the traditional Eastern smile and a fig in the pocket.

Just remember when Russia proposed a strategic partnership to Iran, and when the Iranian parliament approved the agreement, and under what circumstances. I've written about the causes of the current crisis before. The enemy CIA and Mossad are certainly involved, but the Iranian authorities themselves created the base .

So we didn't really lose anything. We have a difficult tactical partner, and one side has a historical grudge. It's not a given that the current Iranian government will collapse. The people dislike Pahlavi even more than the ayatollahs. But even if the government changes or serious reforms take place, the mutually beneficial aspect of the relationship will remain.

Do they really love Russia in Turkey? In Saudi Arabia? But no one refuses money. Or problems that can only be solved together today, only to be abandoned tomorrow. The East, you know.

———

Chinese social media invariably revolves around a few points:

  1. The Iranians sold out Huawei during the US sanctions and led to the detainment of Meng Wanzhou, Huawei CEO’s daughter in Canada
  2. The Iranians signed a “secret” $400 billion 25-year cooperation deal with China back in 2021 but instead used it as a bargaining chip to negotiate with the US and led to the public disclosure of the deal
  3. China’s Dalian port provided shelter for Iran’s sanctioned oil since Trump tore up the JCPOA in 2018 and racked up $450 million in port fee, refused to pay up and instead demanded China returning their oil in January 2025 (I wrote about this in a comment yesterday)
  4. Iran went to sign a defense pact with India after the India-Pakistan conflict in 2025, which was against Chinese interests

A lot of painting the Iranians as “untrustworthy” partner and will only be a baggage for China down the road. You can verify the incidents above yourself, they are all public news.

[–] oliveoil@hexbear.net 5 points 9 hours ago

Oh sorry I misread telegram as twitter

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 16 points 14 hours ago

Yes, the protests are irrelevant now. I’m referring the American pressure

[–] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 33 points 15 hours ago

US attacking Iran would really be a watershed moment.

This is not like the charade after the 12 day war, this has really the potential to get REALLY bad.

And my only cope is exactly that, the US does not want to get bogged down in any conflict, that's why they did the relatively symbolic attacks in Iran with it's subsequent Iranian response. And also why the US didn't go for a full invasion of Venezuela: They don't want another forever war.

This has the potential to become exactly that.

[–] cricbuzz@hexbear.net 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Has Syria Assad fall vibes, tbh

[–] oliveoil@hexbear.net 33 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

IIRC, Syria had every general, commander, and much more bribed to stand down. They tried to take them down for decades and the operation that finally did it took a lot of preparation - and everything fell quickly.

They already had US troops on the ground, and the force that took over already held territory for years.

.

This Iran stuff is very ad-hoc and desperate. The starlink stuff left them with sharing tips over Twitter (the internet) as a last ditch effort to get their commands through.

[–] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 33 points 15 hours ago

Nah not even close.

This is more great power war vibes.