this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
624 points (99.7% liked)

News

37659 readers
1309 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least four leaders of the Civil Rights Division resigned because the section's head, Harmeet Dhillon, decided not to investigate shooting of Renee Good.

Top leaders of the criminal section of the Civil Rights Division have left their jobs to register their frustration with the department after the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon decided not to investigate the ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good last week.

The criminal section of the division would normally investigate any fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer and specializes in probing potential or alleged abuse or improper use of force by law enforcement.

The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February. At that time, five leaders and supervisors of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates public officials for possible corruption, resigned rather than comply with an appointee of Donald Trump’s orders to dismiss the bribery case against then-New York mayor Eric Adams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 192 points 4 months ago (5 children)

All resigning does is let them easily replace you with someone that agrees with them.

If you think you need to resign, stay and make them go thru the hassle of firing you. Drag it out, file complaints, get the union.

Even if it's the same result a year later, that's a year without one more maga bootlicker doing your job.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 43 points 4 months ago

Agreed. It's hard and I get it from a mental health perspective, but the best way to fight them is to make it hard, be annoying, be inconvenient, not just walking away. That's how they win. That's how they stack the department with sycophants and yes-men.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If you don't resign when your job demands you be complicit, at some point you are just following orders.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If you can say “I resign” you can say “this is illegal and I’m not complying”.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This is incredibly shortsighted. It's the same logic for "why don't soldiers just refuse illegal orders?"

The reason is that this is real life and not a movie. What do you think happens after you refuse because your think you're being asked for something illegal? Your boss high fives you and says sorry?

They tell you you are wrong, you either do it or you're fired with cause and you can say bye bye to any sort of unemployment insurance.

Disagree? Okay bro go prove that in court. I hope you have better lawyers and deeper pockets than the company you're now litigating with.

I also hope you don't have any rent, family or need for groceries, because you ain't getting any money while litigating and looking for a new job.

But yeah. Just refuse bro. Ez. Fascists hate this one simple trick.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Don't you lose any employment insurance coverage if you quit?

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Probably, but on the flip side if you have retirement, you may be remaking it getting fired/discharged (in the military branches anyway).

My personal passive aggressive response to requests for work I disagree with is to drag my feet until it’s either forgotten or too late. It’s worked surprisingly well so far.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yes. Unless you can prove a lack of workplace safety or demonstrate that they significantly altered the nature of your position. You can't make an accountant scrub toilets, for example.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What do you think happens after you refuse because your think you’re being asked for something illegal?

What do I think or what do I know?

I've refused orders, been threatened with a legitimate mutiny case, saved people from being sacrificial goats...

If you want to ask questions that's one thing, but I have no idea where any of your assumptions came from...

Like:

you’re fired with cause and you can say bye bye to any sort of unemployment insurance.

That's just a wild opinion to have.

Have you ever even met anyone that works for the federal government in any capacity?

Used to work at a company that was selling computer equipment to terrorist organizations. They wanted an engineer to work with compliance to basically, very illegally, “reclassify” components so that they could get them to shady organizations more easily (figured this out after I had already accepted the position).

I could’ve just quit. But then they would’ve found some other engineer to do the work, and probably quite easily (they were paying well).

Instead I just refused to do what they asked of me. Got yelled at, they tried everything possible to get me to quit (moving my desk alone in the warehouse where it was freezing, making up rumors about me, etc). Still, it took them a year to finally find a reason to fire me (and still, it was without cause, so I got unemployment too). That’s 1 year that I wasted for them.

Most companies aren’t going to go through the hassle of firing for cause, because that opens them up to lawsuits. They will likely just take the hit of having to pay into unemployment, and lay you off instead.

It is possible to say No. You might get yelled at and be treated like shit, but at the end of the day, I knew I was doing the right thing. And that’s what’s most important, in my opinion.

People say “well if I say No, they’ll just fire me on the spot”, but have you actually tried to say No? If they do fire you, then make them go through the hassle of firing you, and for fucks sake, fight back!

If I can do it, anyone can do it.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah that's what they did. And if they stayed there you'd still be calling them fascists. There's nothing they can actually do, it's resign or get fired anyway.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just don't do the illegal thing

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Great advice. Thanks Nancy Reagan.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

"Remember kids, Winners don't do drugs!"

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I wouldn’t work under questionable and actively disingenuous leadership, especially if they’re also ethically clashing with mine, so I get their reaction extremely well.

I couldn’t do it, so I can’t expect others to, but it’s a sad and bitter fact that it just leaves more room for the rot to fester.

But I personally think that the more the rot spreads, the more immediate the threat will seem to most, the more obvious the need for change, then perhaps that’ll encourage more action elsewhere. At best, the rot spreads too fast for its own good and ultimately kills the host. Once the ship goes down, the people can get together to rebuild. With more safeguards and more robust systems.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I couldn’t do it,

If you can say "I resign" you can say "this is illegal and I'm not complying".

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"OK then you're fired"

Resigning gives you control over the situation.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Why do people keep insisting they know about things and then immediately proving they have no idea what they're talking about?

Federal employees aren't the same as civilians.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Also, get on the soapbox. Even if you can't apply social pressure, you can at least inform the people.