this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
425 points (98.6% liked)

PC Gaming

13185 readers
532 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 48 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Tons of shit games are going to have lots of dialogue written by AI. It’s very likely that those games would have had shit dialogue anyway.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but human-written shit still had that human touch. It could be unintentionally funny, it could be a mixed bag that reaches unexpected heights at times. AI writing is just the bland kind of bad, not the interesting kind of bad.

[–] SketchySeaBeast@lemmy.ca 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Great point. There's no opportunity for "so bad it's good". The Room wouldn't have been a thing if Tommy used AI.

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're absolutely right, Lisa!

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Anyway, how is your sex life?

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All your base are belong to us.

[–] RollingZeppelin@piefed.ca 2 points 4 days ago

I should have been the one to fill your dark soul with liiiiight!

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It would probably have been less shit though.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It would probably just have been less dialogue

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago

Which would be totally fine.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

They already said less shit.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 3 points 4 days ago

Eh, we're talking about the bottom of the barrel here. I'm thinking there will be fewer typos, but also an occasional "as a LLM" slip-up, so about the same quality as before.