this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14325 readers
652 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Russia would be their best bet but it seems as though Russia shifted from "We'll give Maduro oreshniks if you don't back off" to "Ehhh, go right ahead" and I'd like to understand why. Some people are saying that there was horse trading going on, where there was a backroom agreement thar the US could have its Donroe Doctrine in return for leaving Ukraine to its own devices but I don't know the truth of it.
That leaves China's air defence systems, but I'm not sure that they're well tested in the field and I'm not sure if they're cutting edge, or Israel/the US.
Maybe in a different timeline Russia might have okayed transfer from Syria to Venezuela but that is not to be.
By this point things are far too late anyway. If there was some really cutting edge autonomous air defence systems that Venezuela could manufacture munitions for domestically then it would be different, but that's an absurdly tall order. Otherwise it would require building up the back end support like radar, training the military in its use, and having a steady supply coming via shipment. The US would knock out radar, any permanent installations, and they'd blockade arms shipments and the lead-in time before it would be possible to have an effective modern air defence capable of holding out against the US would take months and months, if not years.
Drones could have levelled the playing field quite a lot but that still takes a lot of training and it would be hard for Venezuela to get enough or otherwise it probably would have been down to using stingers or something more modern but honesty I think the ship sailed on this one, unless there's major changes to their situation. Also note that the best air defence is only useful if the military uses it and to seems like the Venezuelan military barely fired a single shot so...
better keep one of these on standby
Russia sold some air defense systems to Venezuela several years ago, but there are too few to effectively defend. Most of 150 aircraft USA used were employed for strikes against anti-air positions around Caracas.
the TLDR is that Russia doesn't have the capacity to throw sophisticated air defences, let alone Oreshniks, at anyone who might be at risk of Imperial fuckery.
Plus, as we've seen with VZ, sometimes the best radars and export-controlled systems aren't even a passing threat to the empire. If Venezuelan systems engaged with the US they'd be flattened without much chance of a hit, so most of 'em (sensibly) stayed offline, or were forced offline due to SEAD/DEAD.
However, those systems are still a deterrent to imperialist lackeys that might take advantage of instability, and field much older weapons (like the middle-aged F-16s that Argentina got recently). The US would much rather have some proxy do the killing than risk the blood of its jackboot thugs.
SAM batteries don't seem like a good investment for Venezuela. The Iglas actually did MORE to scare American pilots (esp. if one did get damaged as Trump claimed) than the S-300s, and those are cheap to stockpile and potentially easy to manufacture. Realistically there's not much that will deter US air power, so cost-efficiency is your next best option.