this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
407 points (99.3% liked)

News

34003 readers
4002 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US firm faced a difficult year with unease over chief executive Elon Musk’s political activities and stiff overseas competition.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 66 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Everybody with a bit of sense predicted this would happen.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It's also why anybody with a bit of sense knew the EV subsidies were important if we wanted American car companies to be competitive in the future. Instead our "America First" president handed China the future of automotive manufacturing.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Also the oil industry is still heavily subsidized, so now you have American OEMs fighting a subsidized oil industry, and a subsidized Chinese EV industry.

Their EVs are gonna get fucked at both ends.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

The end result is the US auto industry as a whole being left behind by the rest of the world as other countries expand EV infrastructure and limit or even eliminate fossil fuels across the board.

[–] BoJackHorseman@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Those who forced free market capitalism on other nations don't like free market capitalism anymore lmao

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's never been free market capitalism. Subsidies and anti trust have been around for a very long time. That's also because free markets would never work without regulation.

[–] BoJackHorseman@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago

Well, Venezuela will be forced to have free market capitalism so Chevron can exploit its natural resources.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

if we wanted American car companies to be competitive in the future.

I'd rather it not be Tesla at the forefront. They did some admittedly good things in the beginning to help normalize EVs and build out charging infrastructure.

But I'm not a fan of their vehicle design (interior or exterior), have concerns about their QC and after-sale service, and I won't buy one as long as Musk is at the helm.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's not a reason to nuke the EV industry as a whole though. Removing the tax incentive for all EVs did exactly that.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

My apologies if that is what my comment implied.

I actually think the EV tax bonuses were at least attempting to level the playing field, with tax credits being limited per manufacturer.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world -5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Tesla and the American EV industry was already very heavily subsidized. At least up until near the end of 2025.
To claim Tesla wasn't heavily subsidized already when they made model S is very ignorant.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I didn't claim they weren't. I in fact just did the opposite and said they were in order to try to secure American manufacturing in the future and instead Trump pulled the plug.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

OK then we are in agreement.

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Well, stock holders don't believe this will affect TSLA share price. Robotaxi and Optimus will replace the revenue stream lost on Tesla EVs.

I'll invest all my savings, my wife's savings and kids college funds in TSLA. 😉

edit: added emoji.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

TSLA share prices never had a real correlation to their EV sales. Tesla sells promises, EV cars are a byproduct.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There was actually a super brief window that it did. When they started successfully making the model3/y and everything was growing and profits were high, they actually caught up to their insane PE ratio to a reasonable tech multiple.

It was a very small window though, like 1 or 2 quarters and then it became evident the growth was not going to continue and profits started coming down.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

It’s insane, the crazy high PE ratio was predicated on the idea that Tesla would be the only game in town for EVs or self-driving cars worldwide, but now both of those are obviously not happening I can only conclude there’s some sort of sunk cost fallacy at play.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’ll invest all my savings, my wife’s savings and kids college funds in TSLA.

That's decidedly reckless, you are investing in unproven products that demonstrably don't work yet, and neither Robotaxi or Optimus will ever get anywhere.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I suspected that might be a joke, but there was no indication, and there are actually a lot of people who are that crazy.
So even without invoking Poe's law, that was far from obvious.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

Personally I would have put a /s after such a comment.