this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14256 readers
704 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cuban revolutionaries, including Fidel Castro (far left) and Che Guevara (center), in Havana in 1960.

On this day in 1959, U.S.-backed Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista fled the country following the victory of Fidel Castro's 26th of July Movement (M-26-7) at the Battle of Santa Clara, marking the successful conclusion of the Cuban Revolution.

The 26th of July Movement takes its name from the date of with a failed attack on the Moncada Barracks in 1953, however, the movement bearing this name was not formally organized until the attackers were released from prison in 1955. Public resistance continued sporadically until November 1956, when 80 members of the M-26-7 returned from exile.

Soon after landing on the island, a separate revolutionary group, the "Directorio Revoluncionari Estudiantil" (DRE), unsuccessfully attempted an attack on the Presidential Palace in Havana.

Throughout 1957, armed resistance from groups such as the DRE and M-26-7 would escalate. After a failed offensive by the government against rebels in the summer of 1958, the rebels launched a major counter-offensive.

On December 28th, 1958, after a fraudulent election in favor of Batista, revolutionary forces reached the city of Santa Clara. Seizing equipment from an armored train intended to transport government reinforcements, the rebels quickly captured the city, prompting Batista to panic and flee to the Dominican Republic with a personal fortune of more than $300 million.

In the following days, revolutionary forces entered Havana with no resistance, and Castro established a provisional government. The 26th of July Movement later reformed along Marxist–Leninist lines, becoming the Communist Party of Cuba in October 1965.

Batista later settled in fascist Spain, dying there in 1973 at the age of 72.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ratboy@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The more that I read the more pissed the fuck off I get about all of the stereotypes and arguments against Marxism and outright lies about it and about Lenin.

I read a very in depth bio about Lenin and just finished State & Rev, and now I'm reading Blackshirts and Reds and Chomsky is quoted saying that Lenin intended for the intelligentsia to run the state NO THAT WAS THE FUCKING NARODNIKI!!!! LITERALLY EVERYTHING YOU FUCKERS SAY ABOUT THE IDEOLOGY IS WRONG AND HAS ALREADY BEEN IDENTIFIED AND RIGOROUSLY ADDRESSED BY MARX AND LENIN FUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCXKKKKKKKKKK

monke-rage

[–] ratboy@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Like really I haven't read much theory or anything and I feel like I can debunk all of the accusations/criticisms from the left and the right already wtf

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Chompsky, known associate of Jeffry epstine, one made the following claim while possibly flying on the Lolita express

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Narodniks weren't interested in a state run by the intelligentsia, they were fully agrarian pilled, they were weebs for the russian peasantry, it was just that they managed to convince literally 0 russian peasants. Like they thought that the Russian peasantry was the revolutionary class, as soon as they were convinced by the intelligentsia.

[–] ratboy@hexbear.net 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

they were fully agrarian pilled, they were weebs for the russian peasantry

Lmao that's so good. I know they believed that the peasantry were the revolutionary class, but they believed that they (the intelligentsia) were essentially the vanguard of the peasants, did they not?

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

They did believe that the peasantry needed a vanguard to lay down the path, yeah. But again the whole thing was fully built around a fully activated and mobilised Russian peasantry, hence the need to "go to the people" for which they were so (in)famous.

[–] ratboy@hexbear.net 2 points 4 weeks ago

Gotcha, yeah the distinction there is important. Chomsky is still stupid and more wrong than I am, though. Lol