this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
268 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

11294 readers
314 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

💳 Defense Aid 💥


💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️


🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine is set to field its first officially codified domestically built grenade launcher armed ground robot, after the Ministry of Defense approved the Droid NW 40 robotic combat system for service with the country’s Defense Forces, developer DevDroid said on December 23.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EnderLaw@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (6 children)
  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

  2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think it will be programmed that way.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The writer of the laws himself made his career by writing an entire book series with stories about pointing out where the laws break down.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In this case I think they're broken down immediately because they won't be used.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. Spend months in a meeting room with everything from ethicists and philosopher to machine learning specialists and developers to figure out each nuance of the rules

  2. or program it to kill everything until the batteries run down and send it out within the hour

The answer in a war is always the second option.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Screamers. Check it out.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He did also do some stories about 'fixing' the laws but in every case that resulted in either limiting the robots capabilities in a restricting way or requiring them to have more power over people in ways that could be harmful to humanites self autonomy in the longrun.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. A robot may not damage shareholder value or, through inaction, allow shareholder value to come to harm.
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 weeks ago

Must. Make. More. Paperclips.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe this is only for fully autonomous robots. These are human controlled, more like an rc car with an upgrade.

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But there are aerial drones currently in use that have AI targeting.

[–] greygore@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually autonomous? Or guided by computer vision? Technically CV is AI but not what concerns most people.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ukraine has autonomous drones as autonomous as "there must be a tank around these parts, go destroy it!" and it executes.

Now they even recognize the type of tanks, their armor, so that they target its known weak point, and if it can't, it targets the turret to make it at least unusable.

They probably have something similar as a submarine drone they used to sink the Russian submarine (it was most likely too far and underwater for remote control, and the drones had to pick the right target, or had a precise map and not lose positioning).

So they're probably close to make these slaughterbots also autonomous to some degree.

I never imagined humanoid shapes to be the perfect Terminators except for infiltration anyway...

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 5 points 4 weeks ago

Right off the factory floor they are programmed to increase shareholder value. Some of them become accountants.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Which this article is not about.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 16 points 1 month ago

Asimov wasn’t any more of a legislator than Dante was a theologian

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There are loops. Killing a few Russian invaders will prevent many Ukrainian killings.

There's at least one story I can remember about that.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] lornosaj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Foundation adaptation on AppleTV. Where, famously, spoilers

Tap for spoilerDemerzel, this robot in the gif, kills lots of people by exploring the loophole that let robots commit genocide in supposed compliance with the 3 laws.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Holy shit. Random, I know but you just convinced me to check this out.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you start on season 1, don’t let that dumpster fire dissuade you from the rest of the show. Once you get past that, the show is solid

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the empire story line is basically what holds that season together imo

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah the plot lines outside of that are kinda garbage. And I say that as a fan of the original books.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah anything non empire is kinda bad until this latest season. idk if they condensed a lot of shit from the books or what, i never read them

It’s more that they sharply diverge from the core ethos of the books.

Dumping the admittedly misogynistic bent of the source material was a great move (including switching the gender of one of the core protagonists). Pretty much every other change made around the foundation-centric plots was straight up poor show running and writing. It goes from high sci-fi to “just another future-y action show”. And many of the plot changes are just.. completely nonsensical.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They also explore this on I, Robot

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

They are Isaac Asimov's rules for robots. Google it, it's a whole thing.

[–] doo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think it's a loophole. Surgeons hurt people in order to prevent a greater pain. ruZZia is just a cancer.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's seen as an unexpected loophole in the books. Similar to how a surgeon won't kill one healthy person to save two with their organs.

At least on I,Robot

Edit: also, on I,Robot they harmed very specific people with very calculated results. Not like going to war, even on the defensive side.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 4 weeks ago

From the first time I read this as a kid, I recognized that in order for a robot to adhere to these rules, they would have to be programmed with these rules. A bad-faith robot builder could simply not include that programming.

A bad-faith robot builder like literally every one that accepts US government contracts.