this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
115 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

5125 readers
1139 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

They're all aware that the chance of success is minimal. However, the one that actually succeeds will achieve an absolutely dominant position both economically and politically. So they're basically all gambling their companies on being the one that achieves AGI first while being well aware that failure is the most likely outcome. And at this point they can't pull out because the consequences would be devastating.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Going all in on a tech fundamentally incapable of achieving AGI is a bit dumb, to put it mildly.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We don't know that yet. While the technology in its current state won't cut it, there can always be some new breakthrough, that moves the field on.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

There is no breakthrough that will make an llm sentient, and dumping the world's supply of RAM into it 1) doesn't amount to a "breakthrough", and 2) will never turn llms into something they're not.

[–] DonPiano@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We don't know it yet in the same way that we don't know yet whether pressing the right order of buttons on a soda vending machine will make it sentient.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The soda machines are very upset now. I'd be careful about going near any, if I were you.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What you're saying makes sense when we're talking about Google or OpenAI or something, but this was a Japanese font company. I really doubt they were chasing AGI — more likely they were using generative AI to make slop fonts and failing miserably.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only exceptions seem to be the multi-billion dollar enterprises like Microsoft

That was what my answer was referring to.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gah, my mistake.. That's what I get for replying to messages immediately after waking up...

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

No sweat. I guess I could have put this more clearly.