Chapotraphouse

14230 readers

676 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net

Serious question: Have the executives pushing for AI to be in everything ever actually used AI? (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 month ago by CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Or do they just take what marketing people say about the tools at face value? Because they seem genuinely surprised that people don't like the tools, when even the most ardent AI enthusiasts I've seen that use the tools are well aware of their limitations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] D61@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasn't one of the first AI products a way to have the machine write replies to emails and texts for you? I would be incredibly surprised if they don't use the machine to make slightly less auto-reply-y sounding auto-replied email responses.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Is just baked into Gmail and Outlook now. I can't even draft an email without it trying to "auto complete" entire paragraphs with bogus nonsense info. Which is definitely not okay when that email is about detailed design/engineering specifications.