this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
161 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

5206 readers
949 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This article points out some of the common tells of AI writing using a lot of examples gathered from attempted Wikipedia edits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

OP's article is applicable.

ChatGPT uses the same style for emails. Flowery prose, bold/italics, and huge blocks of text that don’t say much of anything. Another hallmark is “slop” phrases; overused terms you eventually learn to recognize. See this:

https://old.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1g6k4ci/superslop/

https://github.com/sam-paech/antislop-sampler/blob/main/slop_phrase_prob_adjustments.json


Also check out EQBench’s slop taxonomy in the writing bench: https://eqbench.com/creative_writing_longform.html

And the slop score, which is an indicator more than a detector: https://eqbench.com/slop-score.html

Fortunately, the vast majority of non-developers (like your boss) use ChatGPT or Gemini, and their style is pretty easy to sense… I call them “deep fried.”

But different models can be harder to sniff out.

Like, if I wanted to fool you, I’d probably pick GLM 4.6 with task vectors, a slop blacklist, the force it to think in Chinese (so its own English tokens don’t bias it). Then it’d be basically impossible to detect.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the links, saving this to peruse later 😁