news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.
If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.
Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.
Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.
Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.
Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.
view the rest of the comments
Honestly pretty solid reasoning on why even pro-Ukraine people should talk about. The shear amount of corruption, and just how little the EU or US report on it, really makes me wonder whether winning was ever actually important to any of these people.
Lining your own pockets and hurting Russia (at the, sometimes literal, expense of Ukrainians) seems like the much more common motive.
some of that money that should've gone to the Ukrainian War effort, went to buying a golden toilet. Does it get more obscene?
But why do they need money? They got their weapons for debt. They can just do a Keynes and employ their people to build what they need to build. Is it just that they weren't importing protection materials like concrete and rebar and stuff?
Is corruption really limited to money? They can just as easily steal and sell physical items, and even get those employed people doing labor that doesn't actually support the war effort. You can fit a whole lotta corruption in that bad boy.
I guess? If you're selling literally weapons, body armor, and shielding from a fucking warzone to somewhere else, I would think corruption would simply not be a forceful enough word to describe that action
I mean, unfortunately, that's one of the most common kinds of corruption. War is messy, so it's easy for stuff to get "lost". The Western media loves reporting on when it happens in Russia, like with those ERA plates that didn't have any explosive in them.
They don't just have infinite money because they have a lot of weapons from the west. Wars involve a ton of other ongoing expenses, especially when you're being invaded.
Money isn't real. Sovereign governments can't run out of it. Of course issuing more can cause inflation, but are you gonna tell me that inflation is worse than not having defenses?
I think inflation can cause their society to completely crater without Russia doing anything further, and Zelensky needs to avoid getting couped for completely wiping out what meager savings people have and getting on the bad side of enough of the military.
Can to just consider what you said here?
It's better that bullets, missiles, and drones kill people and destroy infrastructure than it is for Ukraine to devalue their currency.
Is that really the position you hold?
I'm saying that there's a balance, you can't just arbitrarily let it rip.
Got it, so how many ukrainians should die in order to prevent a point of inflation?
I'm not talking about "should" anything, and I think controlling inflation is a factor in conducting the war effectively, but I think Zelensky has demonstrated repeatedly and quite explicitly that any amount of Ukrainians dying is acceptable when the alternative is him losing his position and/or the favor of his western masters.