this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
75 points (100.0% liked)

movies

2200 readers
303 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
atomicpoet@piefed.social
BoozeOrWater@piefed.social
TheImpressiveX@piefed.social
75
Netflix to buy Warner Bros film and streaming businesses for $72bn (www.bbc.co.uk)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/movies@piefed.social
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

An intermission would be a deal breaker for me.

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I can think of a hundred reasons why that would be a bad idea. Then again, I'm really tired of these 2.5+ hr movies with no break.

The intermission during The Brutalist was such a treat.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

Hot take, maybe some movies should have intermissions and others shouldn't

[–] amorangi@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I always like to drink a few beers at the movies, and 3 hours is too long to wait for the toilet. Anything over 90 minutes I'm in favour of intermission.