this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
848 points (99.5% liked)

News

33465 readers
1781 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The wholesaler is the latest company to file a lawsuit against a federal agency over the president's signature economic policy.

Costco Wholesale has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, asking the Court of International Trade to consider all tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act unlawful.

The company said in a Nov. 28 filing that it is seeking a “full refund” of all IEEPA duties paid as a result of Donald Trump's executive order which imposed what he called "reciprocal" tariffs.

“Because IEEPA does not clearly authorize the President to set tariffs...the Challenged Tariff Orders cannot stand and the defendants are not authorized to implement and collect them,” Costco's lawyer writes in the lawsuit.

Global cosmetics giant Revlon, eyeglass maker EssilorLuxottica, motorcycle manufacturer Kawasaki, canned foods seller Bumble Bee, Japanese auto supplier Yokohama Tire and many smaller firms have also filed similar suits

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 251 points 6 days ago (7 children)

This is how they transfer wealth from consumers to corporations

We pay the tariffs Corporations get the tariff refund

Trickle up economics as usual

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 133 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If you look at Costco's actions in the past they have been pretty fair for their customers. Costco is actually in a very good position where they know exactly who bought what and Costco can issue refunds to their customers based on that data. Even if they just do it as 'store credit' it would still be very welcome to most of their customers and that would help to offset Costco's administrative costs of determining the refund amounts for everyone.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 112 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I like Costco as much as the next person but they will absolutely not be refunding us based on what we purchased lol

I’ll happily eat these words but im fairly certain I won’t have to

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 104 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The article states that on a bunch of items they’ve just been eating the cost so they’ve been paying the tariffs instead of passing them on. For those cases, there is nothing to refund to the consumers.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but it doesn’t state they’ve eaten the tariffs on everything just certain staple items

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And I would wager those items they've eaten the cost on, is what they're seeking compensation on.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It ~~literally~~ says this in the article

[–] Mpatch@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nah as it stands, costco is a bro.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Used to be then they became one of the worst customer service sites to visit. I hate Walmart and Sam's club with a passion, but damn if their denial of my kids to run inside and go to the bathroom while I got gas pissed me off to no end.

[–] Zanathos@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is what I hate about these places. You need your membership card to check out. All the items are too big to fit under your coat which thwarts shoplifting to some degree.

Why the hell do you need to see my card at the door? Just put a scanner with turnstiles at the front of shop if it's that big of an issue.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sam's club understands this. And frankly it's refreshing.

[–] Zanathos@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

My local Sam's is hit or miss. Half the time they ask me and other times they don't. I have admittedly stormed past them without providing proof in the past while they call after me lol.

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 days ago

Probably not, but they did state last year that the extra money they made from the gas station (they kept it competitive with other places) was used to keep the yearly “admission” price the same.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I've also heard that costco doesn't suck to work for as far as retail goes and many will actually work most of their career there.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Fwiw the people seem cheerful enough. At least not dead inside like Wal mart or any other big chain.

[–] UnspecificGravity@infosec.pub 14 points 6 days ago

My stepson works for Costco. They are a fantastic employer compared to other retailers. They also do legitimately promote from within, including for business office professional positions.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I can speak from experience when I say this, Costco is great to the warehouse workers, they treat IT like shit.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago (12 children)

From the article:

In May, on Costco's earnings call, Chief Financial Officer Gary Millerchip told investors that about a third of Costco's sales in the U.S. are imported products. Millerchip said items imported from China represented about 8% of total U.S. sales.

Millerchip said that while Costco was seeing a direct impact from tariffs on imports of some fresh food items from Central and South America, it decided not to increase prices "because they are key staple items" for its customers.

Some of those fresh food items included pineapples and bananas. "We essentially held the price on those to make sure that we're protecting the member," he said.

In September, Millerchip told analysts: "We continue to work closely with our suppliers to find ways to mitigate the impact of tariffs, including moving the country of production where it makes sense and consolidating our buying efforts globally to lower the cost of goods across all our markets."

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Honestly, that's pretty decent of them.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Maybe. It depends on if they raised prices first to capture the losses. I know that seems like what a business would do first and what everyone predicted, but did they?

If it's true, then Costco just needs to give away free hot dogs meals (drink and side) to their patrons for a year.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My small business did not raise prices, and recouping that $6k would make a HUGE difference for us. But I know most companies probably aren’t in the same boat.

[–] digredior@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 6 days ago

The article states that Costco did not raise the prices on food staples imported from Central America.

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Isn't corporate profit at the expense of the consumers like ... the whole point of capitalism?

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 6 days ago

So, they shouldn't challenge the tariffs?

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Maybe we need a class action saying the same

[–] webhead@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

You didn't actually read the article did you?