this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
117 points (66.1% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8212 readers
73 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There’s a clear campaign against the mentally ill with the global rise of fascism. Lots of it shows up in anti homeless rhetoric, but you can see it in the MAHA and anti vaccination movements.

There’s no reason to use the word “r-tarded” to describe someone. As someone who’s worked with the intellectually challenged, it’s an insult to them to compare them with people who are willfully ignorant.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As someone who grew up with a very close friend with a sister who has down syndrome who really disliked people using the word as an insult I strongly disagree with you.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So if I, as an ugly person, dislike people using "ugly" as an insult, should that mean everyone is not allowed to use the word?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It's already considered particularly hateful to insult people based on their appearance as opposed to their actions, so I'm not sure what your point is.

Also specifically disagreeing with this

People like OP, who care too much, are what keep it a slur used to degrade people with an actual clinical condition.

Which is unrelated to what you said so I think you may have misunderstood me. I'm saying that people with down syndrome and people with family members with down syndrome telling people to not use that word as an insult are not degrading themselves/their family member by doing so.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s already considered particularly hateful to insult people based on their appearance as opposed to their actions, so I’m not sure what your point is.

Well that's the thing, the word is not being used to insult people who are actually afflicted with the condition.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Exactly, and that's already a particularly hateful thing to do that many people have a problem with, so what's your point? You're asking me what if you didn't want people to do it and I'm telling you that's something many people already don't want people to do, so the hypothetical doesn't make sense.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

I'm saying that playing language police in this way is a waste of time and effort because even if you get people to play along, you haven't really accomplished much of anything when people just reach for a synonym for the exact same purpose.