this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
87 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14180 readers
667 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean granted this isn't THAT horny but still volcel-judge

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Addressing social issues reduces social instability, conservative policies and cultural norms only empower the NGOs and intelligence agencies (and intelligence agencies masquerading as NGOs) to find willing informants and collaborators. I don't get it.

[–] KelvinSpace@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

I think in the long term you are correct. However, in the short term social reform can often engender a reactionary backlash that increases social instability. For a weak state that’s on the defensive against global capital, social reform can be seen as unnecessarily risky. That’s especially true if substantial fractions of the party hold socially conservative beliefs themselves. Personally I agree that not addressing these issues directly is a mistake even if I think care has to be taken to education people and create public support for reform.