this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
85 points (100.0% liked)

news

24730 readers
476 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The deal would include a December vote on a Democratic proposal to extend ACA tax credits for one year, multiple sources said. It would take 60 votes to pass.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 66 points 5 months ago (5 children)

What the fuck is this "deal would include a vote" shit I keep seeing.

This shit is like if a union were offered promise of a review of pay in a contract, instead of an actual promise of increased pay. A good union wouldn't accept that shit ever because it could still result in not getting better pay.

I do not get it.

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 40 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

they’re caving with just enough plausible deniability to trick the average dem voter into thinking they tried - but tbh i don’t think many would buy it despite how gullible some of them can be

the turbo cynical take is that now that the election is over, they feel secure in not needing to do anything at all for their base, since they feel they can get votes by simply not being republicans

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 38 points 5 months ago

warren-medusa We'll do what I want now, and then we'll do what you want later!

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It more as if they need to reopen the government ASAP because the shutdown is actually starting to have serious effects now on things like air traffic and commercial aviation. No one wants to be blamed for messing with travel during November - December, the holidays. This isn't just a rich people issue, the US has very little passenger rail and the country is huge, so people travel by plane to visit family across the nation. (This is my understanding as a non American). The Democrats got to use the shutdown to campaign, win some elections in blue states (with some big margins to be fair), cause some chaos in the Republican party as they deal with the electoral loss. So the Democrats got to have their fun, but now it's time to actually get the government reopened before air travel gets completely gridlocked and Walmart goes broke because welfare programmes are suspended. The vote on the Affordable Care Act/ObamaCare tax credits is just a formality. It's not serious.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 27 points 5 months ago

This isn't just a rich people issue, the US has very little passenger rail and the country is huge, so people travel by plane to visit family across the nation.

Under developed country using air travel as a crutch for under developed basic infrastructure the rest of the developed world takes for granted.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago

That explanation seems incomplete. The election we just had showed that voters are not blaming Democrats for the shutdown, if air travel and food stamps are suspended they'd only benefit while Republicans eat all the blame.

I think the donors are just telling them to wrap it up. They got a win, time to go back to business as usual.

[–] OptimusSubprime@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

Just heard on local TV news...

Sens. Ruben Gallegos and Mark Kelly saw the same thing Awoo did and oppose the short term deal. But it looks like this shit is still going through.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2025/11/09/shutdown-deal-doesnt-suit-mark-kelly-ruben-gallego-arizona-senators/87189516007/