this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13915 readers
796 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Love how the severity of this makes it sound like you’re a draft dodger or something. “Being an objector” sounds like slang from a YA dystopia.
It would fit as a YA dystopia term so well. If the author wanted to really push it the in-universe chuds would have a dehumanizing slur where they call them objects.
You see people who don't care did exist before the oath of allegiance, but since it is established the relation to it is framed in the terms of for or against (objectors).
Of course this has a dialectical attribute the non-participant of the oath was only created due to the "oath ritual" in its specificity.
Corollary if someone would object or not participate, then this becomes a very clear political act, the negation of it. So while it is a tool of forced unity it also bears the seed of resistance in it, even for "unpoliticals". Would love to know how many "unpolitical" students in the USA do object, though.