this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
126 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14118 readers
798 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Did the gunman acted alone, was there a second shooter?
  • Did Bibi "warcrime" Netanyahu personally assassinated Charlie?
  • Who benefit the most from the assassination, where was Ben Shapiro when Charlie got shot?
  • Where were Hillary Clinton and John Podesta at the time Charlie was shot?
  • Did Trump order the assassination to distract from his Epstein files scandal?
  • Was Charlie a crisis actor, did he fake his own death?
  • STEEL BEAMS CAN'T BEND BULLETS!! WAKE UP EVERYONE
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The latest conspiracy I've read is from Judge Napolitano (I've seen his name on youtube, but have never watched his videos, but he seems to be critical of US geopolitics including Israel). According to him, Charlie Kirk's wife Erika's dad worked in the US Defence industry and has connections with Israel. From the few clips I've seen posted, Kirk did have some criticisms of Israel's Genocide in Gaza. So the conspiracy is that Israel/Mossad had Charlie killed, and have Erika take over TPUSA (which she has) and appoint a new TPUSA host that will be very Pro-Israel.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only interesting thing I've ever seen Napolitano do is interview John Mearsheimer.

Mearsheimer's a weird guy, he called the Ukraine thing (US foreign policy is going to cause a war between Russia and Ukraine) back in the Obama years. He seems like he should be amenable to interviews on leftist outlets but I only see him going to weird right wing libertarians' shows instead. He denounces the genocide in Palestine and so do his hosts, but none of them ever seem to even consider that they should work with leftists against it.

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't Mearsheimer a neo-con? He probably just thinks the genocide is a waste of resources when the US needs to be pivoting to China (IIRC that's his take on Russia/Ukraine).

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not sure, he calls himself a realist not a neocon. I genuinely haven't been able to understand or make sense of his whole ideological position in part because it doesn't seem like an ideological position so much as just describing what he sees.

He consistently makes the mouth noises that indicate he thinks killing people is immoral. I haven't heard him saying the US "needs" to be pivoting to China and I guess I'd be surprised if he had, because that's a pro war stance and he doesn't seem pro war. But I think some people who orbit him take that position

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Occam's Meiser