Fuck AI

4106 readers

496 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

251

Science Journalists Find ChatGPT Is Bad at Summarizing Scientific Papers (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 days ago by ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If only scientific papers had some kind of summary. You know like something in front of the paper that abstracts the entire thing down to less than a page.

[–] mere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

to be fair abstracts are extremely dense and not really meant to be read by anyone outside that particular field