this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
192 points (100.0% liked)

news

24361 readers
1064 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

yeah, a little bit wondering if they drugged him and the KKKoroner didn't check or there's a plausible way to conceal that without getting found out immediately

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I guess you could just lie on the paperwork but toxicology would be really hard to conceal medically without really tampering with a corpse in an obvious way. When someone dies their circulatory and other systems tend to cease functioning so whatever is present innthe blood or digestive system at the time of death will stick around. A corpse can't sober up, so aside from filing a false report there isn't much else you can do to lie about that

[–] jack@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When someone dies their circulatory and other systems tend to cease functioning

Hexbear is home to finest scientific minds

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

Im a thinker's thinker

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess it depends on the poison and how it was administered, but generally there's no way you're getting any substance out of his system without it being even more obvious than the presence of the substance itself. Usually poison gets circulated pretty broadly throughout the body and that's not something that you can just excise.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i was thinking like spiking his drink and then killing him

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, you'd expect whatever was put in his drink to exist throughout his system. You know how you can smoke pot and have a form of it show up in your pee (a metabolized byproduct, not the drug itself)? It's like that, but it also (in both cases) applies to all of the blood in your body. What are they going to do? Pump all the blood out of his body and replace it? That's extremely difficult if not functionally impossible and, assuming it's possible, would both cause an external wound and probably fuck up his circulatory system structurally. It's also just logistically not possible unless you mean that the coroner himself did the cover-up or someone else involved in the legal custody of the corpse. And that's probably the easiest part, because the evidence would also be embedded in other fluids, like those in the eye, tissues throughout the body, and maybe even hair.

If this person was poisoned and a second coroner is being hired under suspicion of the first one being dishonest, there is no way they wouldn't be able to discover this fact even if truly extensive and absurd measures were taken to try to hide it.