this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
1209 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

9230 readers
1591 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The "he was fired for talking about Charlie Kirk" narrative is a lie.

He was talking mostly about the Epstein Files.

2 days ago
1 day ago

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He was fired because that was the plan when Colbert was fired. They literally said he was next.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Okay but why in that way - during the taping of a show? That doesn't seem very "planned". That seems like a desperate rush.

Over the weekend would have been smoother. Hell, just about any other way would have been smoother.

They gave Colbert another year.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 60 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Someone in the administration (not Trump obviously) is smart enough to know to strike while the iron is hot. Use the Charlie Kirk killing to justify all kinds of shit that they want to do anyway while they have an angry army of supporters to shout down anyone who dares to speak up against their actions.

They were always going to declare antifa a "terrorist organization." They were always going to come after Kimmel. They were always going to put democrats on lists to be investigated. The MAGA anger over Kirk's killing just gave them the opportunity to speed up the timeline and they couldn't let it go to waste.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I still say it was about THE EPSTEIN FILES and not the nazi that the other nazi shot.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago

Partially yes. But I'm positive that they were looking for their own Reichstag fire and found it in the Kirk killing.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Colbert getting canned was a test. They saw they could get away with it, so now gloves are off and off Kimmel goes in one night.

Everything they do is a test to see if they can get away with something. If they do, they ratchet up to the next horrendous idea.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don’t doubt they wanted to gauge reactions. I doubt ABC was part of that in any way.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

Whether they were or weren't, they didn't try to stand up and say no. That's all the information I need.

Sorry I can't gauge your sarcasm I just watched Anne Rice bullshit. So just in case:

When asked by Jonathan Karl at ABC News asks

What do you make of Pam Bondi saying she’s gonna go after hate speech? I mean, a lot of your allies say hate speech is free speech

Krasnov responds

[I] should probably go after people like you, because you treat me so unfairly. You have a lot of hate in your heart. Maybe they’ll come after ABC.

And a few days later an open loudmouthed and funny critic of Krasnov gets fired at ABC. No connection whatsoever.

[–] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

ABC execs only care about money, same thing with every other corporation bending the knee