Slop.

750 readers

648 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

VILenin@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Hestia@hexbear.net

oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net

Diva@lemmy.ml

Diva@hexbear.net

mathemachristian@hexbear.net

126

assigning unimpeachable veracity to a document that makes a point to refer to one of its subjects as a "biological male," for what clearly must be no purpose at all (hexbear.net)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by WhyEssEff@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you think the state would do that? just go out there and fabricate evidence? powell-propaganda

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] trinicorn@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah like, I mostly buy the narrative/haven't seen evidence for any of the conspiracy theories going around, but this particular document is so fucking sus, and the lack of timestamps or anything else to go on to corroborate or add context, means there's really no way of knowing atm if its real, and the feds absolutely have obvious motive and ability to fabricate this.

unfortunately not thaaat rare livagar L

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

the lack of timestamps

Imagine if this whole exchange is from some elaborate roleplay from 2023.