this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

news

24254 readers
504 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Arnaud Bertrand

This is extraordinary. For the many of you who wonder how the EU could agree to such a humiliating "deal" with Trump, wonder no more.

We have an unusually straightforward answer directly from the horse's mouth: Sabine Weyand, who's the Directorate-General for Trade at the EU commission.

As she puts its:

  • "If you didn't hear me say the word 'negotiation' – that's because there wasn't one." => the U.S. dictated the terms
  • "From the Commission's perspective, this was a strategic compromise, not an ideal economic solution" => they're aware this completely f*cks the EU economically
  • "The European side was under massive pressure to find a quick solution to stabilize transatlantic relations – especially with regard to security guarantees" => the EU agreed to the "deal" under a protection racket
  • "We have a land war on the European continent. And we are completely dependent on the United States. The member states were not prepared to take the risk of further escalation – that would have been the consequence of European countermeasures." => Europe acted out of fear, choosing economic submission because of its total dependence on the U.S. (which ironically will only worsen the dependence)

There you have it, she said the quiet part out loud: the EU is in such a terrible strategic situation and EU leaders have so little courage that they're unable and unwilling to say 'no' to even the most humiliating demands.

https://xcancel.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1960603151154790469

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jorge@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My other post was already long. I agree the US is fiercely opposed to peaceful coexistence with the sovereign world, and its economy is unproductive. If the US loses its ability to pillage other countries, so it finally has to live on its own production, it will find that an ocean of bankers and crypto bros is no substitute for actual workers.

My hope relies on the rapid decline of the empire. We have some time, because the US lacks resources and supply chain to sustain a war on China, and also its population is (I think) too divided to embark in such a disastrous war.

The US easily throws foreign cannon fodder (for example, the South Vietnamese) against its adversaries, and it will certainly try to use millions lives from vassals like Japan and Philippines, but I think all these vassals put together have no chance against the Red Dragon, so the US would still need major direct involvement.

The US recognized its defeat to Vietnam after 50k statesian deaths, so I hope it will not dare attack China and lose hundreds of thousands or millions of statesian lives. Perhaps after 10 years of overt fascism the people will be even more bloodthirsty, but in 10 years I hope the disadvantage will be far greater. In fact, the US bubble might burst before that.

Besides, the Japanese did immense evil to Chinese and Koreans. Unit 731 was quite worse than Mengele. Also many women were enslaved for sex. In 2013 the mayor of Osaka said "comfort women" were necessary to boost the morale of the Imperial Army. Japan never compensated those women, even those who were alive just a few years ago. The corpses of these imperial demons are in Shinto temples for war heroes, still honored by Japanese politicians. My point is, the Chinese must be repressing an boiling ocean of hatred. If I was in China's place and Japan dared attack me again, my retribution would be harsh. Japan must know this. Attacking China would be lunacy.

Now, nuclear war. China already has incredible hypersonic missiles which the US can't stop. According to Wikipedia it already has 600 nuclear bombs, and some time ago I read it planned to massively increase its arsenal by 2030. A US nuclear attack on China would be catastrophic for the US. Besides, statesians may be bloodthirsty maniacs, but the Chinese are wise and rational. I hope they will defeat the US without threatening to occupy its territory.

Will the US still prefer its own death than allowing China to live, even without threat of occupation? I hope not. What do you think?

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I think the US will be convinced it can win because it believes its own lies of American Exceptionalism. It will not realize it has gotten in over its head until its too late and my fear at that point is its leader may act emotionally rather than pragmatically.