409
Male vs female gaze rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Neato@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. Every character depiction is intentional. Sexualizing a character is not inherently bad, but it's clear what the point is when it's done.

If you are only sexualizing one type of character, then you are showing bias towards viewers. When this becomes the norm for most art in a society, it says that type of character (and the people it represents) is primarily there for sexual gratification. And when you do that to women, you create a culture where women are objectified as sex objects and little else is given value. It's inherently reducing a major population into nothing more than the desires of the dominant. I.e. oppression, and specifically in this case: the patriarchy.

It’s only bad when all or nearly all characters are sexualized.

I wouldn't even go that far. If you look into porn or porn games you'll see nearly every character sexualized in different ways depending on the intended audience. Romance novels are an example as well. And when the point of the media is titillation and sexual gratification; that's both good and expected.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
409 points (100.0% liked)

196

16282 readers
2216 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS