this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
537 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

19737 readers
1911 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SinJab0n@mujico.org 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I 'member hearing that this "practice" started when a lone researcher tried to publish an articule but was rejected 'cause it was policy that all submissions needed a co-author... and it went trough, he was able to publish this and others really good articules.

So, i dont see anything bad here, mr whiskers can be remembered by future generations with no harm done.

[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 2 points 7 months ago

This is actually gaming the Google Scholar system instead of harmless ones like Willard.

https://www.science.org/content/article/how-easy-it-fudge-your-scientific-rank-meet-larry-world-s-most-cited-cat

[–] notso@feddit.org 1 points 7 months ago

If Furry McFluffface contributes to an article by giving moral support and occasionally walking across the keyboard, it's only fair to make him co-author.