this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
7 points (68.4% liked)
Fuck AI
3710 readers
1576 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The big problem with using an LLM for formulas in Excel is you need those numbers to be right, and if you don't fully understand what Excel is doing to your numbers you can't know when the numbers are wrong nor why they're wrong.
I even had one manager once who took this to the extreme and said no formulas ever just in case the individual doesn't understand them (he also happened to be the worst manager I ever worked for)
OP says it's good, it just messes up a lot
"No formulas ever" what? So you can't even add numbers?
This dude was honestly kinda insane. The most charitable interpretation is that he had a specific idea in his head of exactly how a given task should get done based on what works well for him and any employees deviating from that approach to the task are doing so incorrectly. He also did not maintain up to date documentation of any of his expected workflows so you'd better hope you remember his expected workflow when he comes to yell at you (and he yelled a lot!)
Notably he didn't like automating any frequent tasks nor creating templates because he seemed more focused on what happens if the process goes wrong than what happens if a person makes a mistake. I would argue that humans are incredibly fallible and it's better to have the computer automate the parts of the task that can be automated so that the human can focus on the parts that can't be and work more quickly and efficiently, but he was far more concerned about the rare instances where the automation might break.