this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13960 readers
844 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
67
It seems like an evolutionary flaw to make a species that walks upright but also make their backs this super fragile thing... (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 week ago by SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

...that if they ever use in even a slightly wrong way can end up leaving them with debilitating pain for the rest of their lives.

Really bad design flaw, wtf NATURE!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Evolution: I made that spine for quadrupeds, you lunatic. What was I supposed to do, throw everything out and start from scratch the minute a protohomonid freak decided it would be funny to start going around on two legs?

[โ€“] huf@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

ahem, it made that spine for bony fish. land animals was already stretching the design beyond anything reasonable