143
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
143 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13930 readers
633 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not a single voter will blame the republicans you idiot, the republicans will say this is your fault and their base will clap like seals and the rest will remember that you did nothing.
Democrats aren’t ineffective idiots, they’re actively malicious demons who are sick with glee at the thought of how much this is going to help their fundraising.
They're both, and given that all their "Let's let the Republicans smash stuff so we can fundraise of it" has failed spectacularly and repeatedly, at this point assuming any kind of Machiavellian intelligence is itself stupid. They're failing at basic pattern recognition.
The image of democrats as poor little confused fellas is DNC-manufactured. The finances of big-shot Dems and the goals of their top-dollar donors have been anything but “failing spectacularly and repeatedly”. The dems have been wildly successful at their goal of keeping the left from any semblance of real power beyond the local level. The reason they keep failing to enact progressive policies even when they have a supermajority is because progressive policies are what they’re there to prevent.
It isn't about them being poor confused victims. It's about them simultaneously having a job which in part consists of serving as a pro forma opposition party that offers no real alternative and perpetuating their own existence, and also the fact that they're really fucking bad at it because the average age of a dem politician is retirement age and all their staffers are idiots.
Has it failed? Have they not been successfully fundraising off of it?
I wish more people understood this.
I think Democrats care more about how it benefits their stock portfolio than political fundraising.