1707
submitted 11 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

As more and more states pass laws targeting "pornographic material" in books and online, they are repeatedly running up against a problem: The Bible has not just a few passages that could be considered indecent

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yuriy@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

there shouldn’t be a fucking bible in a school library anyway, that’s so bonkers. is there also a torah and a quran? BET FUCKING NOT.

[-] gummybootpiloot@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Idk what libraries you go to but the ones I know have most religious books

[-] yuriy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

my public highschool library did not feature any religious texts, the regular library has plenty though.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

When I was a kid I remember checking out a book from my elementary school library. My brain tells me it was called “Tales of Terror” but I haven’t found anything close with that title. It had butterflies killing people in swarms, rats eating human flesh. It was nuts.

Well, my people found the book. They claimed they could “feel the demons crawling from the book” when they opened it. Half my damn family went to the school and went off about it.

This comment brought that memory back for me because I remember one of them saying, “you got this filth in here but ya ain’t got the bi-buhl?!?”

I’d love to see that book again, if only to see if it was truly as horrible as I remember.

[-] Widowmaker_Best_Girl@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Nah fuck that noise. Banning books from libraries is dumb

[-] cristo@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

There should be a bible, along with every other religious text they can get their hands on. The problem arises when they ONLY have bibles in the library

[-] Violette@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

And put them in the "fiction" part

[-] CertifiedBlackGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Most relegate them to "religious texts" to take the easy way out ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Well you see, the quran teaches evil and radicalizes children (teaches rules, changing between positive and negative tone, kinda outdated but some generic stuff still applies today) while the bible teaches us how god loves us (teaching overlapping with the quran, different writing though and yahwee is definitely not nice)

[-] saltynuts420@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

imho libraries shouldnt have any religious books , if you want to read them either buy it yourself or go to the temple/ mosque / church / synagogue .... and I am writing this as a religious person myself

[-] CertifiedBlackGuy@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

I actually disagree as an atheist. I'm fine with religious books being in a library as long as all religious texts are relegated to the same area and no single religion is given preferential treatment.

They are a part of our culture and history, whether we want it to be or not.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I disagree.

Libraries contain books people want to read.
People want to read religious books.
Libraries should contain religious books.

Libraries should please the reading needs for as many people as possible.

And I am not religious in the slightest.

Btw libraries are a very useful resource for research.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
1707 points (97.2% liked)

News

22583 readers
4008 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS