this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
823 points (99.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

2862 readers
1682 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mamdani, a proudly socialist 33-year-old, holds a 44-36 percent lead over over former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo – who was hoping that New Yorkers had short memories, and were ready to re-elect the textbook centrist Democrat.

However, after the disaster of Trump’s first year back in the White House – with everyday American life interrupted by protests, immigration raids, corruption allegations and the unshakebale feeling that the nation is about to enter World War 3… It seems the pendulum is swinging back towards left-wing politics.

It appears that the success of Mamdani isn’t so much a vote against Trumpian politics, but more a vote against the stale nothingness of the Democrats top brass – who, while pitching themselves as the progressive option in America’s political system, very seldom action – or even – offer – left-wing policies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 113 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Dems continue to be baffled by the popularity of progressive politicians. They can’t fathom Americans wanting less & less to do with their moderate-right-wing bullshit, while the far-right moves farther & farther right.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 41 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

It's the foreign influence within the DNC brought in after private money flooded US politics. Get rid of Citizens United and the system will do a lot to correct itself.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 12 hours ago

It's always foreigners, isn't it? What about the domestic private money flooding US politics? What, because they're American billionaires, it's fine?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 29 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Lol, no it really isn't. Citizens vs United was the culmination of decades of the DNC constantly bending over backwards to compromise with conservatives.

Basically in the late 80's and early 90's the legislative grid lock we all know and love today was becoming the status quo. So a strategy of compromising with "moderate" conservatives over policy that benefited aspects of both parties was popularized by the Clinton's.

This "Thirdway politics" led to short term benefits, and allowed the Clintons to get a death grip over the DNC. After a short period conservatives took advantage of this tactic of compromise to drag the DNC further and further to the right. Basically every sitting senator and most of the politicians in the house made their political careers by being the best at compromising with the right.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I was under the impression moderate compromise was code for working to satisfy donor demands. Which wouldn’t be so pressing with meaningful campaign finance reform.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I was under the impression moderate compromise was code for working to satisfy donor demands.

At best. Usually it just means rank capitulation to fascists.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 7 points 13 hours ago

It was definitely touted as one of the benefits of Thirdway politics. However, the real imperative was ending gridlock in Congress. Back in the late 80s and early 90s gridlock was new and actually seen as a big problem, especially after it caused a gov shut down under newt. Bill Clinton basically swept the presidential race for his second term for "solving it".

[–] Bigfish@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

While you're not wrong, I don't know how we can possibly put that genie back in the bottle.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago
  1. Stack the court then sue Elon or any PAC.

  2. Cling to power for 40ish years and realign the court as the conservatives die.

  3. Impeachment and removal of corrupt justices, then sue.

1 and 3 are the only remotely realistic but I'm not that optimistic right now.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Vote DNC, it's one of their primary stances. It requires either enough Republicans to cross the aisle to defeat filibuster (never happened never will) or a DNC house majority and senate supermajority to amend the constitution.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Or a simple majority of democrats willing to do away with the filibuster. Won't happen. They like being able to use the filibuster for its only purpose: blocking progressive legislation.

There has been only one filibuster since trump took office for a second time. It wasn't against anything.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 18 hours ago

Not moderate, not center, firmly not-openly-sociopathic-yet right.