'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism' is a catchcry used to argue against consumer action because it is morally impure. I don't care whether my actions are morally pure; I care about the results they produce.

Leftists are shit at focusing on the results of their action. The end-game of leftists is to feel morally superior: never mind that no good results have been achieved.

Using syllogistic logic:

Surface premise: 'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism'
Hidden premise: And we should only take actions that are ethically pure
Conclusion: therefore we shouldn't reform consumption

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

we gotta borrow from the atheist in foxholes phrase and start saying "there is no ethical consumption under capitalism - this is not an argument against consumption"