this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
999 points (99.1% liked)

News

30200 readers
5293 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How is this not bigger news?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 144 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Anyone want to bets that it was a Nazi who did the shooting?

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Those where in Europe, they have since rebranded themselves to wearing red hats

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Some of them call themselves Nazis.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago

Black rappers are calling themselves nazis and selling swastica t-shirts on Super Bowl commercials.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's funded up, but unsurprisingly expected

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Guess I have one thing in common...

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Boycott RHEL!

wait, what? Really? Oh..

This just in: This may not be related to RHEL

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As someone who works for Red Hat, I really wish it would have been any other color that Trump chose.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, you’re now owned by IBM who did help the Nazi’s… seems like it’s come full circle!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, if you're going to start listing the US firms that helped Nazi Germany, we're going to be here all day.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago

I was going to be here all day anyway :(‘

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Basically any company that existed back then.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, trends in politics and culture really shafted the brand.

  • Nothing wrong about red hats if it wasn't for Maga.
  • Nothing wrong with fedoras if it wasn't for 4chan incels 15 years ago.

Now I'm curious if it'd be possible to rebrand to GreenBeanie. It has a nice ring to it.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Fedoras were Redditors, not 4channers. The idea was that you had guys who thought they were dressing nice by wearing a cheap fedora and like cargo shorts.

4chan incels don’t leave the house.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He was dressed as a cop, driving a police car, wearing a blue uniform, and a bulletproof vest.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Is he a cop then? The cop car part is confusing otherwise. Uniform etc. not so much.

Edit: I see elsewhere that the car was disguised too

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

No, he and his wife ran a security firm that said it owned the same vehicles as used by the police

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Disguised” we’ve willingly made police cars so obscure they don’t stand out anymore. Here in Maine every car could be a cop car.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

There's one in my town that is black. With black writing on it that says police. The only way to see the text is to see the difference in sheen between the paint and the writing.

it should be very illegal

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, every time they get a new upgrade over here it’s even harder to detect. But it’s part of the uniform. Should stand out and be hard to replicate.

Start calling 911 when you get pulled over to confirm it’s a real officer and really just make it a headache for him and they’ll go back to normal.

“Hi I’m just calling to verify this unmarked pulling me over is a real officer” they will get the picture after a couple of thousand of those

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, cops call this ghost marking. They do it to skirt around the laws regarding marked vs unmarked vehicles. Unmarked vehicles have stricter requirements, so cops ghost mark their vehicles and say “look, they’re technically not unmarked, so they don’t have to follow all of those stricter rules.”

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

Then they’ll check your window tint with their expert window tint detector flashlight.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In Minnesota?

Cop cars are very distinct. Big white and black SUVs with guard rails and big ass lights. They look like they're going to run you over fun. I call em intimidation transports.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We have three different colors of Ford escapes with very discreet light bars. They look like every other fucking Ford escape on the road or whatever those stupid SUVs are. So every Karen looks like a cop and every cop looks like a Karen.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah I've been looking at them since @LilBOkChoy said something. They must be newer. They are quite literally impossible to see.

Seems appropriate for a police state though. China must be jelly of them

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This isn't completely accurate. I live in South Saint Paul and some of our police have Ford Explorers with no visible light bars and dark blue lettering on black paint.

I've seen state patrol make stops on 494 between the Wakota bridge and 35E in dark blue unmarked chargers.

They're relatively new I think but that same trend of low-profile police cars has started here now too.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think I've seen an unmarked cop SUV in St Paul before, maybe it was one of yours, or maybe it was this fucker?

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm in South Saint Paul so if you were in Saint Paul it was a different one since that's a different city.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 21 hours ago

Goddamnit. Would explain the lack of police cruisers I've seen up there.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

Yeah spend all this money on tanks and shit, then they’re gonna drive around in a Hyundai?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Qualified immunity coming in 3, 2, 1....

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Tell me you don't know what qualified immunity is without telling me you don't know that qualified immunity is.

Edit: Seems like a lot of people don't know what qualified immunity is.

Qualified immunity means a cop can't be personally liable in civil litigation for legal actions taken while doing their job.

It has nothing to do criminal prosecution when they break the law. It basically just means you have to sue the police department, not the cop.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He feared for his life. They were coming right for him.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure what that has to do with being protected from a civil lawsuit.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tell me you didn't get the joke without telling me.

Qualified immunity

A significant amount of criticism contends that qualified immunity allows police brutality to go unpunished.[6] Legal researchers Amir H. Ali and Emily Clark, for instance, have argued that "qualified immunity permits law enforcement and other government officials to violate people's constitutional rights with virtual impunity".[45] Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has noted a "disturbing trend" of siding with police officers using excessive force with qualified immunity,[46] describing it as "sanctioning a 'shoot first, think later' approach to policing".

The joke being that the suspect was an offer who showed up, claimed that their life was in danger, and shot everyone to death. The officer will then use qualified immunity as a defence to an extrajudicial killing.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee -2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but the joke is based on the misconception that qualified immunity means immunity from prosecution, which is false.

Spreading misinformation is always bad.

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Right... You just clarified that they're immune to civil litigation. And we all know they won't be charged criminally. So what we're saying is that they get off scot free.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

He is an evangelistic Christian

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 20 hours ago

On reddit they said it was a evangelical pastor, go figure