this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
61 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13877 readers
805 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I think dark colored cars should be illegal. It's just not safe. A dark blue or gray that blends with the road, headlights off takes whole moments more to perceive.

[–] Formerlyfarman@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But then, how would they defend against predators? like gigantic moths.

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

Pintle-mounted speargun.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

it should be impossible for people to turn off their headlights, even in more visible paint colors the risk is fucking ludicrous for no discernable benefit.

[–] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm a strong believer of this too. It's a myth it uses more fuel. It helps with visibility. I have my headlights on and I've had other drivers or pedestrians tell me they're on and it's "of course they are it's safer!"

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It used to be more valid when cars used standard incandescent (I think?) lightbulbs with much shorter lifespans than modern ones. It’s not a problem anymore

[–] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah definitely when you had to swap bulbs out frequently it made more sense.

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it a myth it uses more fuel or is it just negligible to the point of being immeasurable in practical terms?

Because the energy has to come from somewhere.

[–] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

the energy has to come from somewhere

The car is making electricity when driving lights on or off. If the battery is full it's lost to waste.

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago

If the battery is full the alternator doesn't output any significant current. It doesn't provide any extra load to the engine.

how am I supposed to flee the police at night without stealth mode?

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For some reason I thought that Daytime Running Lights were required in the US, but apparently they're not (they should be!). I feel like most newer cars I see have them, but I can't say I've been taking a careful inventory.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

even on cars that have them, it can be a setting rather than what automatically happens. one car i drove had a normal daytime setting but i thought it was the highbeams since an even lower 'running light' existed.

there is no reason for normal people to have the option to turn them off, a film crew or photographer can get technical and under the hood if they need to

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've never thought to myself that I couldn't see a car well because of its color, maybe at night I guess but if the lights work it doesn't matter.

Now those hyper polished cyber trucks you've probably seen pictures of, that's crazy

[–] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Might be a country related thing. In Australia our country roads are blue black. There's a popular colour for cars that is almost camouflage. You see the car but slower.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

IMO it’s more of a problem in busy traffic. If 95% of cars have lights on, your brain will subtly look only for lights. Especially dangerous in countries like USA where there are so many unprotected left turns and where right on red is allowed.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

I think cars should be illegal

based