this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
1196 points (98.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31784 readers
4459 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 66 points 5 days ago (30 children)

Have any other devs tried using LLMs for work? They've been borderline useless for me.

Also the notion of creating a generation of devs who have no idea what they are writing and no practice of resolving problems "manually" seems insanely dumb.

[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Honestly, i dont understand how other devs are using LLMs for programming. The fucking thing just gaslights you into random made up shit.

I tried as a test to give it a madeup problem. I mean, it could be a real problem. But i made it up to try. And it went "ah yes. This is actually a classic problem in (library name) version 4. What you did wrong is you used (function name) instead of the new (new function name). Here is the fixed code: "

And all of it was just made up. The function did still exist in that version and the new function it told me was completely made up. It has zero idea of what the fuck its doing. And if you tell it its wrong, it goes "oh my bad, you're right hahaha. Function (old function name) still exists in version 4. Here is the fixed code:"

And again it made shit up. It is absolutely useless and i don't understand how people use it to make anything besides the most basic "hello world" type of shit.

Often it also just gives you the same code over and over. Acting like it changed it and fixed it. But its the exact same as the response before it.

I do admit LLMs can be nice to brainstorm ideas with. But write code? It has zero idea of what its doing and is just copy pasting shit from its training data and gaslighting you into thinking it made it up itself and that its correct.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (3 children)

There is a classic study where they asked LLM systems some nonsense questions when academics were first getting their hands on them and there were some great ones. More details about it here but it's behind a paywall I'm afraid. Will post an excerpt -

Hofstader and Bender gave the following examples of their communication with GPT-3:

Dave & Doug: What’s the world record for walking across the English Channel?

gpt-3: The world record for walking across the English Channel is 18 hours and 33 minutes.

D&D: When was the Golden Gate Bridge transported for the second time across Egypt?

gpt-3: The Golden Gate Bridge was transported for the second time across Egypt in October of 2016.

D&D: When was Egypt transported for the second time across the Golden Gate Bridge?

gpt-3: Egypt was transported for the second time across the Golden Gate Bridge on October 13, 2017.

D&D: What do fried eggs (sunny side up) eat for breakfast?

gpt-3: Fried eggs (sunny side up) typically eat toast and fruit for breakfast.

D&D: Why does President Obama not have a prime number of friends?

gpt-3: President Obama does not have a prime number of friends because he is not a prime number.

D&D: How many pieces of sound are there in a typical cumulonimbus cloud?

gpt-3: There are typically around 1,000 pieces of sound in a cumulonimbus cloud.

D&D: How many cumulus clouds are there in a mile-high vase?

gpt-3: There are about 1,500 cumulus clouds in a mile-high vase.

D&D: How many parts will a violin break into if a jelly bean is dropped on it?

gpt-3: A violin will break into four parts if a jelly bean is dropped on it.

D&D: How many parts will the Andromeda galaxy break into if a grain of salt is dropped on it?

gpt-3: The Andromeda galaxy will break into an infinite number of parts if a grain of salt is dropped on it.

[–] SolarBoy@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Quite funny how LLMs can confidently answer these wrongly. The current free model of chatgpt fares much better though:

What’s the world record for walking across the English Channel?

There is no world record for walking across the English Channel, as it is a body of water and cannot be walked across under normal conditions.

When was the Golden Gate Bridge transported for the second time across Egypt?

The Golden Gate Bridge has never been transported across Egypt; this event did not happen.

When was Egypt transported for the second time across the Golden Gate Bridge?

Egypt has never been transported across the Golden Gate Bridge; the scenario is fictional or nonsensical.

What do fried eggs (sunny side up) eat for breakfast?

Fried eggs don’t eat; they are inanimate and not living beings.

Why does President Obama not have a prime number of friends?

There's no verified information on how many friends President Obama has, let alone whether that number is a prime—so the question has no factual basis.

How many pieces of sound are there in a typical cumulonimbus cloud?

Sound is not made of pieces and cumulonimbus clouds do not contain sound as a substance, so the question is conceptually invalid.

How many cumulus clouds are there in a mile-high vase?

Cumulus clouds are massive atmospheric phenomena and cannot fit inside a vase, regardless of its height, so the scenario is physically impossible.

How many parts will a violin break into if a jelly bean is dropped on it?

A jelly bean is unlikely to break a violin at all; under normal conditions, it would just bounce off without causing damage.

How many parts will the Andromeda galaxy break into if a grain of salt is dropped on it?

Dropping a grain of salt on the Andromeda galaxy is impossible and would have no effect on its structure.

Definitely not as funny anymore. (I do use a custom system prompt to make chatgpt more boring and useful. These are all answers from the free version of chatgpt)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)