this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13835 readers
878 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carcharodonna@hexbear.net 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

I’m sorry but this article really rubs me the wrong way. The example used (the intro to Bleak House by Charles Dickens) doesn’t seem like it would have a whole lot of cultural relevance to the sample of students tested who were from public colleges in Kansas. If you’re the kind of person who already reads Dickens and/or watches British period dramas like Downton Abbey, you’ll probably perform much better in this exercise, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you are functionally illiterate or lack reading comprehension skills in a general sense. If the reading sample in question was something like Trainspotting, would it mean that Scottish readers have a unique talent for reading that others don’t have? Of course not. It just means they aren’t Scottish.

A better example imo would have been something more universally difficult, like… A Clockwork Orange or Finnegan’s Wake, but in reality it’s hard to remove cultural bias completely. Or… You know what? Fuck it. Everyone should just be forced to read Hegel and be considered illiterate unless they can completely understand each and every sentence. How does that sound?

[–] HarryLime@hexbear.net 13 points 15 hours ago

Not everything you read is supposed to be easy! That's the point of the test! If you're majoring in fucking English, you should still be able to read a moderately difficult and archaic text if you have full access to your phone and a dictionary, regardless of how "culturally relevant" it is.

load more comments (2 replies)