864
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The National Science Foundation, the federal agency that oversees the U.S. Antarctic Program, published a report in 2022 in which 59% of women said they’d experienced harassment or assault while on the ice, and 72% of women said such behavior was a problem in Antarctica.

But the problem goes beyond the harassment, The Associated Press found. In reviewing court records and internal communications, and in interviews with more than a dozen current and former employees, the AP uncovered a pattern of women who said their claims of harassment or assault were minimized by their employers, often leading to them or others being put in further danger.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ace0fBlades@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago

Makes you wonder what challenges women will face in future space exploration missions. Long periods of isolation with groups of coworkers with very little personal space. Not like a belligerent party can be ejected out the airlock (It''ll probably happen who am I kidding)

[-] IverCoder@lemm.ee 50 points 1 year ago

Not like a belligerent party can be ejected out the airlock

a m o g u s

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago

there's no doubt that sexual predation would be a big issue and that women would be the first victims of any violence, but it's just part of the greater concern over authority in such a small society.. who is in charge, how are rules enforced and misbehavior punished.. i'm not optimistic that a Mars outpost would be able to survive its own judicial system, for example.. or any of the prepper compounds.. they're sort of all guaranteed to descend into really barbaric circumstances socially..

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

or any of the prepper compounds

You wouldn't want to be stuck for a long time in a society made up exclusively of people with severe anxiety and personal issues who reject society? I can't imagine why.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i'm pretty sure they're all guaranteed nightmare scenarios.. i think people build them just for the drama.. so they're all drama queens on top of it..

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Future missions should be all-women teams. Problem solved.

Women eat less, use less oxygen, and weigh less than men. There's actually no logical reason to send male astronauts anywhere.

Edit: lol @ the downvotes with zero responses

[-] Gigan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nah that's misandrist bullshit. We've done plenty of all-male space missions and they had no issues.

[-] babeuh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are reasons to do that, women and men react differently to long-term microgravity.

I found this study about the differences (but it's from 2014, please tell me if you find a more recent one) The Impact of Sex and Gender on Adaptation to Space: Executive Summary.

TL;DR female astronauts have, according to the study:

  • a higher risk of cancer (a 45-year-old man has a 344-day limit in space versus a 187-day limit for a 45-year-old woman)
  • more orthostatic intolerance
  • more UTIs (which makes sense as women on earth are also more likely to have UTIs)
  • less vision impairment compared to male astronauts (no clinically significant cases of VIIP syndrome)
  • less hearing problems (men show a more rapid decline in the left ear and in general as well, but this is the case on Earth too)


Keep in mind that this data is not the best because only around 20% of people that had been on the ISS at the time of the study were women and because male astronauts are more likely to come from a military background.

I personally think this means we should send an equal amount of both sexes (maybe more women as it would help get more data on the differences). Sending all-men or all-women missions sadly won't fully solve the problem as sexual assault isn't always between men and women, that said, it is less common so it's not a bad idea.

Anyways, more investigation is required. If you find a newer/better study please tell me (or if something I wrote is inaccurate), I don't want to spread misinformation

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I have a feeling people picked for those types of missions will be vetted harder than "Hey, want to see some snow"

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
864 points (98.0% liked)

News

23310 readers
3380 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS