this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
1515 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

13681 readers
3213 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 100 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (27 children)

I think a really exceeding important clarification here is he edited the genomes of human embryos, not babies. Babies are already born humans, embryos are a clump of cells that will become a baby in the future. I do not condone gene editing without consent, which is what he did, and yes there is lots of questionable ethics around gene editing but he did NOT experiment on babies. This should be made clear especially in a science based community, memes or not.

Implying that babies are the same thing as embryos is fundamentally incorrect, in the same way a caterpillar is not a butterfly and a larva is not a fly, the distinction is very important.

EDIT To add further detail - One of the reasons this is so unethical is that he experimented on human embryos that were later born and became babies. His intent was always to create a gene edited human, but the modifications were done while they were embryos, not live babies.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have talked to some Americans who claims that sperm + egg = baby and I want to place an egg in front of them and ask them what it is and if they say anything other than a chicken, I will laugh.

Also, thank you for the distinction. Kind of insane to call embryos babies. It is shit like this that makes me feel like my brain is shrinking when I talk to some people online.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

They became babies when they were born with experimental modified genomes without their consent

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Babies are conceived without their consent.

In case of a C-section, they are born without their consent (implying that they would rather grow up inside the womb :P (look, idk what babies think when they don't come out, but we sure aren't asking them whether they'd rather stay in there))


I would rather be asking if Dr. He had the parent's consent before modding the foetus.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Obviously the notable, unusual, unethical thing here is the non-consentual gene editing, not the mere occurence of birth

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am trying sooo hard to come up with a point without bringing up the chemical-transification of children, without their parent's approval, which has been following them being mislead by pro-trans (as in "go become trans because all your problems are your gender") evangelists.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My apologies, I didn't realize I was speaking with a lunatic.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 4 days ago

Just with someone who remembers how easy it was to be mislead by adults, as a child.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 1 points 6 days ago
load more comments (25 replies)