California
Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.
Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.
Related Communities:
Nearby Communities:
- California
- Bakersfield, CA
- Bay Area, CA
- Burbank, CA
- Fresno, CA
- Long Beach, CA
- Los Angeles, CA
- Oakland, CA
- San Diego, CA
- San Jose, CA
- San Francisco, CA
- Sacramento, CA
- Santa Clarita, CA
view the rest of the comments
This is an issue that exposes some of the more dogmatic people in the movement.
It is as if there is a list of positions that you're required to believe and if you disagree with any one of them you're labeled a heretic (transphobic, in this case).
Sports and the fairness of competition is a complex issue even when you're just talking about cisgender competitors:
Can a person use performance enhancing drugs to train and then get clean enough to test positive for a competition? It seems unfair, to me, for the other competitors if this is the case.
It isn't an unfair statement to say that the physical performance of cisgender men is higher than that of cisgender women. This is why we have separate competitions for men and women.
The issue isn't as simple as a choice between "Transgender people should be free, without question, to compete in any competition" or "Transgender people should not be allowed to compete as their gender"
Framing it in such a black and white manner is harmful behavior, no matter which position you take.
We need to understand how people's bodies are affected and what advantages of disadvantages are obtained and then base the rule changes on objective data and not appeals to emotion or ideological bullying.
This has been my biggest issue with a lot of people on the far left for a long time now. There is no room for anyone who might agree with 90% of their politics but disagree on one thing. In this case it's the transgender athletes topic. My own mother who is deeply left/blue/democrat has issues with this specific topic as well and she has seen just how inflexible people she believesd to be her own political allies can be about these things.
This isn't just an issue of the left (or of the right). It's a human weakness and we all suffer from it. It is very difficult to examine your beliefs individually and most people use this as a mental shortcut.
It becomes harmful when it scales up to an entire group or community where you have people (with power, like moderators) who enforce dogma through excommunication (banning) or social shaming (downvotes, dogpiling, cyberbullying, etc). This creates large groups of people who believe most of the things, but are also afraid to speak out on the other topics for fear of reprisal and social stigma.
That isn't healthy and it is up to every individual to speak out against dogma when they encounter it, especially when it is very unpopular to do so.
Most people are too scared and/or weak willed to speak up against something they might disagree with from their own "people" so to speak.
Fear of being abandoned or cast aside leaves a lot of people feeling trapped and that they have to go along with it.
It's very unfortunate.
I grew up in a conservative christian family and I am the only leftist atheist.
I very much understand the consequences and dangers of speaking up against dogmatic communities and the difficulty in explaining 'No, I'm still a good person, I just don't believe that specific thing' to people who see you as, literally, an agent of Satan. I've been physically assaulted, ridiculed, bullied, and excluded by people who let dogma lead their thinking.
Doing it online is a lot less intimidating some senses. However, there are a lot of young people who get trapped in these dogmatic communities and feel like there is something wrong with them because they have doubts.
To them I say: There's nothing wrong with you, it is okay to ask questions, to disagree and to expect people to justify their beliefs. The people who are trying to bully you instead of convince you are the ones in the wrong, even if they are otherwise good people or you otherwise agree with them on other topics.
I agree 100%.
What I think is this is not a government issue. Whatever regulations are the ones that have rules against performance enhancing drugs in competitive sport are the only ones that should have any authority on this issue.
Do not make excuses for this nonsense being spouted by Gavin Newscom. You have no right to discriminate against trans women, intersex women and femme non-binary people.
Source
Source
Source
This is side-stepping my point completely.
I said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_records_in_athletics
It is a fact that there are gender differences in the outcomes in competitions.
To what extent that these change when a person transitions is unknown and should be studied. It is simply dogma to believe that the moment a person has a prescription for HRT they no longer have an advantage.
Even among cisgender athletes there are genetic conditions and medications that disqualify them from competition. It is simply dogma to believe that the medication and treatments that transgender people receive have no effect on performance (and also, somehow, have the immediate effect of removing the advantage that cis men have over cis women).
Yes, this a wonderful example of dogmatic reasoning "If you believe this, then you have to believe this or else you're ~~a heretic~~ unreasonable and akin to a flat-earther. It isn't reasoning based on objective facts, nor does their conclusion logically follow.
As an example, I believe that cis men are men and also that cis men who use PEDs should not compete. It would be just as silly for someone arguing on the side of PED use to say that 'You either believe that men should be able to compete in sports, or you don't and there is no reasoning with you'. It's nonsense, it isn't reasoning it's intellectual bullying.
I absolutely support trans rights, that doesn't mean that I will allow another person to simply dictate my opinions. If a person unable to have a conversation and simply tries to dictate the things that I must believe then that person is wrong regardless of what other beliefs that they have which I agree.
You just replied to a post with several studies about exactly that.
On top of that, you are ignoring the balance of justice and ethics here. Unless there is significant evidence that having undergone male puberty prior to transition (this already doesn’t describe all trans women athletes) gives a significant advantage, fairness dictates that trans women should be included in women’s sports. The harm done isn’t justifiable by a “maybe.”
There is significant evidence that people who have undergone male puberty have an advantage. You can see this in the list of Olympic world records.
The question that has to be answered, and encoded into the rules of competitive sports, is: what causes this advantage to erased by transitioning, how can we verify that this is happening to an individual and what rules should exist to cover these cases in order to ensure fairness.
I don't get why this is controversial.
For example:
If HRT is responsible for lowering testosterone which removes the advantage, then how long does it take to become effective? Should a woman who started taking HRT yesterday be able to compete in women's sports, or should they have to wait for some period of time?
If someone stops taking HRT, does the advantage return? If so, how soon and to what extent? How can we verify that an individual isn't stopping HRT or abusing their medication to obtain an advantage?
All competitions have rules to ensure fairness and that includes things like understanding how medical treatments or genetics affect performance and rules. There are many medications and treatments that athletes simply cannot use while competing for the sake of competitive fairness, this should apply to all athletes and all medication or treatments.
No, you linking the Wikipedia page for Olympic records isn’t evidence of that, because we aren’t talking about cis men. We’re talking about trans women who have medically transitioned. You are not prepared to have a conversation about this if you are grouping these groups together, because medically they are not the same.
Because it’s an insanely restrictive policy for no reason against an incredibly tiny minority that had already been allowed to compete at the Olympic level for over a decade before a trans athlete ever won a medal, and it was a nonbinary athlete who hadn’t transitioned and played on a team sport of their assigned gender. If this is as huge an issue as people want to pretend we would have seen the elimination of cis women in sports by now.
RTFA.
You are inventing a scenario in your head to pearl clutch about, because this doesn’t happen outside of co-ed sports or elementary school sports with kids who haven’t undergone puberty. Anyone who tells you it does is lying.
Trans athletes already get blood tested for their hormone levels.
Seriously, all these “reasonable points” you think you have were addressed decades ago by sports governing bodies, and trans people had been quietly living their lives the whole time. You just didn’t notice it because Republicans were focusing on gay people then. Don’t fall for the bullshit.
Can you at least attempt to skim the studies linked to you before replying from the same place of ignorance? I had a similar opinion to you when this issue was first brought to my attention; unlike you, I put in effort to educate myself.
Please, read them and others like them. Literally, most of your gotcha questions you asked are already answered in the studies. We have a good amount of objective data on this topic.
Because of people like you :)
No, it's not. The topic is "do trans people have an advantage" and the answer is "no"
"Transitioned" is a stage of transition, if they don't have an advantage at said stage then there's flat out nothing else to be said, and that's the current reality
Do you have any studies showing exactly when they lose their advantage?
Because, as I linked before, cis men outperform cis women. I'm assuming that you agree with this point.
If a person transitions to a woman then they, at one point, had the inherent advantage and now they do not. When exactly does the advantage disappear? Is it instantaneous? Does it take a week or a year? What blood tests and data points can be used to determine when this process is complete?
These are the questions that matter.
Obviously the people arguing that trans people should never compete are ignorant, I'm not supporting that position. From the point of view of fairness in competition there has to be an objective answer that's backed by objective tests.
Simply declaring that trans people are beyond reproach and that any attempts to quantify biological advantage are unfairly discriminatory and anyone asking these questions is a bigot isn't helpful.