this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
406 points (88.0% liked)

Science Memes

12359 readers
2208 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They were for several hundred million years. What changed?

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The evolution of micro organisms capable of eating dead trees and emitting CO2 as a metabolic byproduct.

don't forget the role that the Great Oxidation Event played in this.

Basically, earth's atmosphere was devoid of oxygen from its beginning, and it took billions of years to change that. it wasn't until life had learned about photosynthesis before large amounts of oxygen started to accumulate in the atmosphere.

however, oxygen is a necessary prerequisite for most animal/fungus consumers, as they use oxygen to break down the organic materials. that is probably when major fossil fuel production stopped.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Nothing. You're just asking trees to do something they're not meant to do. Absorbing a single year of carbon emissions would require half the planet's land area of trees. And that's just while the trees are growing and absorbing a lot of carbon. Trees just aren't efficient enough on a per acre basis to make a dent in carbon emissions, let alone capturing the carbon already in the atmosphere.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Trees never evolved for the purposes of mass capturing carbon from the air as efficiently as possible. Yes, they convert CO2 to O2 as part of their life cycle, but algae and other organisms have a much bigger role in capturing CO2 and turning it into O2.

Furthermore, so much of the CO2 that we emit is CO2 that was sequestered in the past over those very same 100s of millions of years. Meaning that going the natural route will take that amount of time.