this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13684 readers
853 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Actually it’s pretty clear what the diplomat said here ,he basically said that Mao didn’t want to split from the USSR and since Khrushchev wanted the DPRK leadership to be in line with the new Soviet policy of de stanlization, Mao tried to keep their relations by ousting Kim il sung
What ended up happening is that the younger members of the workers party of Korea believed in Kim Il Sung since he was a Korean while the people trying to overthrow them were foreigners
Regardless the DPRK still exists
Late Mao and Deng’s foreign policy are the same policy ,not much difference ,only difference was their domestic policy tbh
Thanks for replying Mohammed! I just meant I didn't understand Mao's actions, not that I didn't understand the reply ♥️
The sino-soviet split was terrible and Maos actions in this time are a massive stain on his legacy
I agree