this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
154 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14326 readers
546 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's going to be a week and they've yet to release his name even though they lied and said they knew it yesterday. Given this much of a head start, HOPEFULLY, he could be anywhere in the world rn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 61 points 1 year ago (4 children)

but also negates the police’s camera tracking software that can identify people based on their gait.

Not going to argue execution wasn't good, but c'mon. This is about as real as the rest of their shit

[–] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most forensics is junk. Doesn't mean it isn't used though. Do I trust software to do that? No. I can identify my friends and family by their walk though.

[–] LeylaLove@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yeah, once you notice it, everybody walks just a little bit funny. Gait detection is one of the only bits of social (as in people, bullet forensics is usually solid) forensics that I can believe whatsoever

[–] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's valid enough that watching someone walk is used for medical diagnosis

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it is used to diagnose problems with their gait, not like cancer or crisis of identity

[–] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

It's used to diagnose neurological conditions.

[–] Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anecdotal, but I used to know someone with prosopagnosia (face blindness). They'd frequently identify people from further away than I could, partially due to their gait, whereas I had to wait until I could make out their face.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

It's me, your friend! I can often identify people from behind, better than face-to-face, because the face will just cause a distraction for me to identify. Height, clothes/style, gait, body shape, voice, etc... all of these things are put together quickly for identifying someone, as the face is tricksy to my brain

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its also really easy to modify your gait. Put a rock in your shoe.

[–] TrashGoblin@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

"Little Brother" readers unite.

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn't say they wouldn't use it, just that there is no reason you would have to "negate" it. It is clearly just more computer phrenology meant to get jurors to agree to convict. It's not like there's a gait database tied to individuals out there

[–] BobDole@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More like "see you laterbase"

:avril-lavigne-shining:

[–] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

If they're going to use it, there's reason to negate it.

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

This might or might not work. Best not to risk it.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

The software is there, but I don’t know how good it actually is.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

Dogs recognize their owner by gait before it's possible for them to even see a face.

Gait recognition is a thing.