100
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
100 points (86.8% liked)
politics
19245 readers
1394 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sooo....
Why'd he just pardon his own son?
Why isn't he trying to fix this broken law rather than just pardoning his own son who's in his 50s?
Like, if the gloves are off shouldn't Biden be doing a bunch of stuff to help a lot of people at once?
He's fine with his son breaking this gun law for crack, but won't de-regulate cannabis so Americans in states where it's legal won't be breaking the law by owning a gun?
Drunks and (some special) crackheads can have guns but somebody who smokes a little green at night instead of a beer can't own a gun?
Edit:
After four years of political experts outling actions he can take...
It's really fucking depressing some people honestly believe this is all he can do
The president cannot create laws or change the constitution themselves. That's what the legislative branch does.
Yeah, but what if Biden makes it an "official act" to abolish Congress and usurp the ability to make law? It's clearly illegal, but POTUS cannot be held to account so nobody can stop him... right?
Do you not understand what powers the President is given? Executive orders can only do so much, and it's irrelevant when the next administration can simply undo them in a month.
Let's say all he can do is pardon people to save them from trump...
You telling me the only person trump is/was going after is Hunter?
The President doesn't make laws, Congress does. You need to be talking to your representative and Senators and holding them accountable.
About cannabis specifically, he already pardoned the federal non-violent, non-distribution offenders. And his DOJ has recommended the DEA reschedule it to a Class III drug, they're the department that actually controls drug scheduling.
State drug laws are not something the President has control of. Again that you be your State reps.
You seem to either not understand how this works or are purposely ignoring that for whatever reason.
He pardoned some.
He can order agencies to do things and replace them if they refuse.
But even if the only thing he can do is pardon people to save them from trump...
Why is he only pardoning his son who admitted guilt to his crimes already?
Do you and Biden both think Hunter is the only one at risk and the only one that need protection from trump?
Why do you think that Trump is going to give any shit about whether someone has been pardoned already? What in his history makes you think he will follow the law?
So you're happy Biden did this...
But it means absolutely nothing...
Why do you think he did it anyways?
I don't honestly care about it that much. Biden is correct that these specific specific charges are rarely brought to court, and if Hunter were anyone else, they wouldn't have been. There WAS political interference by the Republicans ONLY because it was Biden's son, he was targeted for political reasons, not because of the laws he broke.
The pardon power SHOULD be used in situations of injustice. Individuals being targeted because of who they are related to, race, gender, identity, etc. instead of the merits of the charges themselves. Or where extenuating circumstances provide a lot more context. Law enforcement has a lot of leeway with determining when to arrest and prosecute, and jury nullification exists for context situations at the peer level already. Laws are written by man, and many laws on the books are unjust, some by design. There are situations where something illegal probably shouldn't be, or the context surrounding it needs to be considered. Sometimes the end does justify the means. Government whistleblowers being targeted for instance.
What republicans?
The ones Biden appointed?
Otherwise I don't see how they were capable of doing things the last four years...