334
submitted 2 months ago by vxx@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago

Hmmm I wonder if a vehicle filled with flammable explodey-gas who just drove over 2 metal signs at high speed would be on fire as well? Would it have gotten the attention that this vehicle had, given that ICE cars burn many times more often than EV's do.

It is a tragedy and should be investigated but these articles have to get off the "It's new so it's bad" bandwagon until the investigators come in. It could have been a flat tire at high speeds that sent the car onto that shoulder and over those signs. There is uneven wear on the tires so on the outside of Regenerative Breaking EV's tires look almost new on the outside but trashed on the inside. If it blew because of that, or some nail on the road then there is no fault on Tesla and the man-boy who runs it. If however say steering went or the airbag randomly went off when the car was at speed my least favourite Martian and Tesla would be culpable.

Until then turn the sensationalism on your stories down to 11.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm a fan of EVs, but Tesla lacks ~~security~~ safety and I'm not a fan of it.

It's too complicated to leave the car when power is off for example.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yep. That's my issue. It's not the fire, it's that it's really hard to get out in a disaster.

The Tesla could just have easily killed four if it crashed into water.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

You mean, the mechanical handle present? I'm not sure if older cars over a decade ago didn't have em, but my model 3 has mechanical release on every hinged part. Even the drunk, which no human being would even fit in (I think, I guess a toddler might?).

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Do you think the average Tesla driver knows about these? Are they easy to find and use in an emergency? Could they be easily improved?

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

probably, yes, and improved how, they're just door handles.

[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 months ago

If I recall correctly, the manual override for the electric inner door handle is hidden under some panel. Major lawsuit material if you ask me, and irresponsible by the certifying authorities,

[-] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

FWIW, pretty much every car on the road actually has a switch which completely disables the inside rear door latch.

[-] Tja@programming.dev -3 points 2 months ago

You recall wrongly. It's totally exposed, available all the time. Lots of people who are new actually activate it instead of the button that lowers the window before opening.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And the passengers on the back seats?

That's Model 3 from the article.

And Cybertruck:

On BMW you pull the door handle twice

[-] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 2 months ago

Unless it's a coupe, then you don't have rear doors at all...

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 months ago

You mean it is too complicate to open a door handle? You do know those news stories about people getting trapped in their Teslas had to be taken down because you can just open the door, the people who were trapped weren't only stupid, they were locked in a vehicle with the manual that told them how to get out of the car and they never looked at it.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I posted the manual below, so stop lying

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not Lying. The vast amount of the stories of people trapped in their Tesla when they loose power are drivers and are alone. So this is what the manual says the person who is in that situation has to do to get out of the car. You showed the Back Seat. This is what they have to do in the front seat.

They have to throw a simple latch. Worst case if you run out of power, say pulling into a charging area because the last one you planned on using was down and you had to make it on a very low charge, and the people in the back did not know about the pulley system they would have to either get out of one of the front doors or wait in the vehicle for help.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

no, it wouldn't. Because the car is not filled with aerosolized explodey-gas, but just flammable liquid contained in a robust tank. it is not explosive. It can catch fire, but not simply from impact. You'd need a hole in the tank lower than the current fuel level and an external ignition source. Even if you shoot the gas tank directly, it will not explode. It is physically impossible for it to explode.

Puncture one of an electric car's cells, and it sets off a chain reaction. The whole car very quickly goes up in flames.

[-] Strykker@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago

A hit car engine is an external ignition source, and gas cars go up in flames daily in the us

[-] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

But if the media doesn't report it, lemmings don't know it exists.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

"Robust"? Clearly you've never driven an itlian made car!

Alphas tanks are literally made out of plastic. You can poke them with a basic screwdriver.

Yeah it won't go boom, but point being, they're not robust and go in flames fairly often too...

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago

The fact that you are taking the words "explodey-gas" as a serious reference to the fire and not the form of propulsion that ICE cars use and take it seriously makes me wonder about your media literacy.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

If I made a metal cage for rich people that locked and set on fire, I would go to prison for life probably. This guy does that and sells it to them

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

It's all about the marketing, baby

[-] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Some reasons why they probably would be fine in a normal car

  1. Central computer controls everything. A crashing computer means a crashing car

  2. Electronic door locks. When you crash youre going to have a hard time opening the door

  3. Shatterproof windows mean if your door won't open, you're BBQ

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago
  1. The 'central computer' doesn't control the car's controls. It is made to come to sudden stop if it fails and the person can still steer.
  2. The doors have manual overrides that defeat the locks and open the doors. People who have been "trapped in their Tesla" when it lost power haven't even looked at the manual. Every door and hood has a way to open it from the inside and there is even a way to emergency release the charger if you have to.
  3. Ever single issue is as much an issue for ICE cars as EV's. Bullet resistant windows on most cars are a risk, however some teslas have an override for their power windows. ICE cars have been hacked and taken control of through the computer in their entertainment system, that like a Tesla, actually is the main computer system for their car. ICE cars have Electric door locks as well.
    If the accident was powerful enough to rupture the battery with the metal signposts, it could also open up the gas tank and set it on fire as the car was going in excess of 65.
[-] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Its not about EV vs ICE its about having a dumbass design the car

The manual overrides are hidden away so anyone who hasn't trained on using them is dead meat. also you probably just got a concussion from crashing your car, so they're probably useless

Shattering windows are a safety feature that were removed for what reason exactly?

The transportation secretaries sister died because of these super predictable issues with teslas

I love the idea of electric vehicles but that doesn't mean an idiot should design them

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

OK, on the designed by an idiot, or in this case concepted and OK'd by an idiot, and the rest of the engineering and work of making that work was actually left up to good engineers, we both can agree on.

[-] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

The problem is that the engineers are not in control, and if they say one of the bosses ideas is bad they get fired.

[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 months ago

the second point shouldn't be true, the handles of the front doors should mechanically unlock the door as they are opened. the sub-humans in the back blew what they were getting into.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
334 points (94.2% liked)

News

23626 readers
2970 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS