this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
753 points (99.0% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3733 readers
58 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ **8. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 68 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Idk much about him, but I keep reading here and there that he was terrible. How did he manage to write Star Trek episodes if he was those things?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 103 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

You can be brilliant in some ways while being useless or a POS in other ways.

Steve Jobs was an excellent salesman and marketer. He was an awful father and thought that a fruit-only diet would cure pancreatic cancer. Then, when he realised his curable cancer became incurable because of inaction, he jumped the organ donor queue (because apparently in the US money lets you do that), which not only didn't help him, but also likely killed someone else who it could've saved.

Richard Stallman is an excellent steward of open source software and user freedom in software, and he has been very prescient of the shit that would ultimately come from proprietary software. But he is also a major creep to women and a staunch defender of paedophilia and bestiality.

Someone I knew, before she passed away, was enormously selfless. Gave everything she had to others, fostered a lot of children who all grew up to be great people. Lived with almost no money because she preferred to spend it helping other people, was a big pusher of LGBT rights in the 80s and 90s, helped run a centre that helped HIV victims, never spoke up about the good she was doing because she preferred to keep it a secret... was (astounding to me) enormously racist.

People are complicated.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 month ago

That last one speaks to how some people try and redeem themselves despite their flaws. We're not all cut and dry. You can still be a good person, even if you're flawed, provided the good you do outweighs the the bad. I would also throw a caveat in there, in that you're actively trying to address your faults, too. Doesn't do much good if you're burning crosses and houses to the ground, and then taking in the resulting foster children lol.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

None of us is wholly good, none wholly bad, but all of us can strive to be better, to be kinder, to improve.

Kill your heroes. Not because everyone is evil, and not because there is nobody worth following, but because nobody is worth following blindly. Nobody deserves to be idolized. Strive to be better, look to others as inspiration, look to the past as inspiration even, but remember that just because you do or don’t see someone’s flaws doesn’t mean they don’t have any or that they don’t have anything but those flaws

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Berman wasn’t the one writing or directing, he was the executive producer. which means he also wasn’t producing, he was the one who signed off on other people’s work. Read: he vetoed a lot of good ideas out of fear it would anger the studio. As progressive and intelligent as Star Trek was, he kept it from being so much better.

The writers and the lower producers did what they could. Sometimes sneaking around behind his back to make sure something was shown or said.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For example, Roddenberry wanted an LGBT character as far back as TOS, but it got vetoed by Berman. That would have been incredible for 1960.

I think he also did it when Frakes wanted the non-binary alien he flirted with in one episode to have a male actor instead of a female one, but that also got vetoed.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

This comment confused me because Berman didn’t work on Star Trek until The Next Generation. He couldn’t have vetoed anything on the Original Series.

The main source of pushback during the 60s was the NBC executives (despite Lucille Ball and her DesiLu production company championing the series). Star Trek was constantly threatened with cancellation, then moved to a graveyard time slot for season 3, then was finally cancelled due to “ratings.”

[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] flicker@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's several water!

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I only have, like, four waters right now. Am I ok?

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

You should get a couple more just in case.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Decent people can write stories about murderous characters who do not reflect their values.

Terrible people can write stories about decent people who do not reflect their values.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Because every time he changed an episode's script to "berman it up a little" he'd give himself a writers credit.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As an aside, perhaps that speaks to just how great Gene Rodenberry was to have created the show in the first place? Here's an awesome comic about him.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He survived THREE plane crashes? I don't know if he's the luckiest or unluckiest guy ever.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

Ikr, like did he work for Boeing or...? :-P

He definitely had "character" though, as someone who faced death, multiple times, and had to stare at it and let it change him, to focus his efforts on stuff that really matters in life. (anti-capitalistic principles I guess?:-D)

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Or The Oatmeal is making shit up again. That comic is bullshit.

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I never knew that