905
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Donald Trump on Sunday proposed a new policy that many critics said is equivalent to legalizing "The Purge."

Trump spoke at a rally in Pennsylvania, where he admitted that his attendees were "falling asleep" at one of his earlier rallies. Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign noted that, as Trump was still speaking at the swing-state event over the weekend, rallygoers placed directly behind the former president started to funnel out of the building.

One comment Trump made drew condemnation on social media, as well as numerous comparisons to The Purge, a film series based on a dystopian world in which the government makes all crimes legal for a 12-hour period.

As reported by Sebastian Smith, AFP Washington desk chief, "Trump in Erie, PA, says in US 'the police aren’t allowed to do their job.' To stop crime, you need 'one really violent day.' He says: 'One rough hour and I mean real rough, the word would get out and it would end immediately.'"


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol -1 points 18 hours ago

Voting for any other "not Trump" actually helps Trump. You might as well just not vote.

Just because you put on a veneer of post indifference doesn't make reality any different.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

You can vote for whoever you want. That doesn't mean you don't get to face the very clear negative consequences for how you vote.

If you want to make the choice to not vote for the only candidate that can beat Trump, that's your call. But dont for a second think you're immune from criticism for not wanting to help beat him.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 0 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, that's how the world works. I don't think people who don't vote in line with the Democratic Party care about not being in the same good graces to be considered one of them.

But pushing the false equivalence that somehow not voting for Trump is the same as directly voting for him is foolish and not a good tactic to swing them into voting with the party.

These are anti authoritarian people. As in literally don't like being told what to do. And you can't fix a negative with a negative. People need to feel inspired themselves to do the right things. Otherwise people are shockingly self destructive and will cut off their nose to spite the fact.

You are free to bully people that will say they voting a way you don't like too but don't think it will be productive is my point.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

But pushing the false equivalence that somehow not voting for Trump is the same as directly voting for him is foolish and not a good tactic to swing them into voting with the party.

I did not say that, nor would I agree with that statement. 3rd party/non voters ARE supporting Trump. They are not providing as much support as someone who actively votes for him, but because of the way FPTP voting works, their actions absolutely benefit the GOP more than the Democratic Party.

These are anti authoritarian people. As in literally don't like being told what to do. And you can't fix a negative with a negative. People need to feel inspired themselves to do the right things. Otherwise people are shockingly self destructive and will cut off their nose to spite the fact.

I haven't told anyone what to do. I've explained the results of not voting/3rd party voting, that's all. If they don't like those results it sure sounds like they shouldn't do the dumb shit they're proposing.

You are free to bully people that will say they voting a way you don't like too but don't think it will be productive is my point.

"By doing X, you are causing Y" is not bullying. That's absurd.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com -2 points 15 hours ago

Blue MAGA out here going strong

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

Weak ass bullshitters want to piss in everyone's Cheerios to make themselves feel better. Can't even engage without intentionally misstating me.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 0 points 15 hours ago

Alright last comment cause I got stuff to do. But you literally just said you don't agree that not voting for Trump is the same then said it's practically the same. In literally the next sentence.

Just because someone isn't voting for your desired candidate or your opposition doesn't mean they are supporting the one you have issue with. It literally doesn't work that way. They might not be helping you but somehow it only impacts one side? Cause there isn't a net positive for it anymore? That doesn't equal a positive for the other just literally a neutral "wasted" vote because sure it is.

If you can drive a car and not support climate change than this can be true as well. Attaching a moral equivalence to measure people against for a desired outcome is just you telling people they don't matter and are "other" for not being with you. You aren't say8ng what will happen cause if someone votes third party... They vote third party. That's it. You just don't like it so you push that it equates to something you see as worse.

Step on a crack and you will break your mother's back and you must hate your mother cause you never avoid the cracks.

Pushing fake math to appease your own mind is not exactly great. And you can lament them not helping but saying they are doing something you view as immoral because you view it a negative as a positive for the enemy is creating a wedge that doesn't need to exist.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

But you literally just said you don't agree that not voting for Trump is the same then said it's practically the same. In literally the next sentence.

3rd party/non voters ARE supporting Trump. They are not providing as much support as someone who actively votes for him, but because of the way FPTP voting works, their actions absolutely benefit the GOP more than the Democratic Party.

Not going to continue this if you insist on this bad faith bullshit. Have a nice day!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Okay? That doesn't change the fact that I can't force anyone to vote for anyone or not vote or do anything and I don't have the ability to yell at someone on Lemmy.

Also, for someone who complains about people being silenced, you sure want me to shut up.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 0 points 16 hours ago

Says something inflammatory and false meant to bully people

"Hey that sure sounds like unproductive bullying"

Wow, looks like someone sure is trying to bully me.

OK cool whatever. But you are totally being reasonable and pedantic now so nothing you have done or said before matters. Got it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

I said nothing about bullying, nor did I try to bully anyone. Why are you lying?

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 13 hours ago

You acted like the victim by saying I wanted you to shut up when that wasn't said by me and now are doubling down on the victim for being told something you don't like. I really don't care.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

You say the most bizarre and untrue things.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 12 hours ago

Also, for someone who complains about people being silenced, you sure want me to shut up.

By quoting you?

Are you a troll or that sheltered that you are able to alter every interaction in your head to make yourself the only good person?

Some would call that narcissistic behaviour or borderline personality disorder.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago

I mean... you sure seemed like you didn't want me talking about what I was talking about, but maybe I was wrong about that.

Of course, what with my narcissistic behavior and/or borderline personality disorder, admitting I'm wrong about something is impossible, so now I'm confused.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 11 hours ago

you sure seemed like you didn't want me talking about what I was talking about

And still playing the victim while ignoring that none of what happens in your head is what is happening in real life and I have participated in the conversation the whole time.

I think you are wrong to talk the way you do. And assume things that are self affirming than being honest with reality.

You literally are still using sarcasm and avoidance as a shield and haven't met the conversation once but used the feeling of being right to be your moral compass.

Yeah I would still call you a narcissist.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about, but you sure do like insults.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 11 hours ago

No you just like to say stuff and don't listen to others. So yes I'm sure these all sound like insults.

Oh to have your free time and ignorance.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago

If I'm ignorant, shouldn't you want to educate me rather than berate me? Is this how you think ignorance should be dealt with?

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 11 hours ago

Oh cool, if you want to be educated, well then reread this conversation from the beginning where I try to have the conversation you refuse to have. Then when you get to here and haven't changed start over and reread the conversation from the beginning. And when you get to here and pretend to care again start from the beginning where I tried to have this conversation.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago

Okay, well at the beginning, you accused me of silencing people and yelling and both of those were lies, so I'm not sure where you want me to go from there.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
905 points (97.3% liked)

News

22962 readers
3851 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS