this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
515 points (94.5% liked)

Games

32551 readers
463 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 228 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I hate graphs that don't start the Y axis at zero.

That said, fuck ubisoft.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 116 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's pretty normal for financial charts like this though.

[–] saddlebag@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Agreed. Took me a moment to realise they didn’t drop to zero. !dataisugly

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

A stock would never drop to zero because the company would be liquidated before that happened. If the stock actually dropped to zero they would have no money they need to call bankruptcy before that point.

[–] AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Who's to say we can't drop them to zero :)

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

You need to include the instance in the community name.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s unfortunately standard with all stock graphs :/

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

There is no point of starting the chart to 0 since it doesn't give any information other than the share price, which is already communicated by the Y axis anyways.